No abstract

Purpose: Although the combination of irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil is clinically active, it is associated with significant toxicity and resistance. Studies were carried out to define the optimal dosage, sequence, and timing for the combination in mice bearing xenografted human tumors.Experimental Design: The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil in combination was determined in nude mice. Therapeutic efficacy against established human colon carcinoma xenografts, HCT-8 and HT-29, and human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenografts, FaDu and A253, was determined using the rugs individually, simultaneously, and in sequence with various intervals in between. Treatments were i.v. weekly ؋ 4. Immunohistochemical and reverse transcription-PCR measurements of relevant drug-metabolizing enzymes, apoptosis-related proteins, cell cycle distribution, cyclin A, and S phase fraction expression were carried out and compared with the therapeutic outcome.Results: The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan resulted in cure rates of 30% or less in all xenografts. No cures were achieved with FUra alone. Concurrent administration of irinotecan and FUra, or of FUra 24 h before irinotecan, resulted in cure rates of <20%, except for FaDu (60%). Administration of irinotecan 24 h before FUra resulted in the highest cure rates, 80% in HCT-8, 0% in HT-29, 100% in FaDu, and 10% in A253. Conclusions:The optimal therapeutic synergy was achieved when irinotecan was administered 24 h before 5-Flurouracil. Sensitivity to this combination was associated with poor differentiation status, higher cyclin A index, recruitment of cells into S phase, and induction of Bax expression and apoptosis.

No abstract

Identification of biomarkers to recognize individuals with Barrett's esophagus (BE) predisposed to develop malignancy is currently a pressing issue. We utilized gene expression profiling to compare molecular signatures of normal esophagus and stomach, BE, and adenocarcinoma (AC) to identify such potential biomarkers. Over 22,000 genes were analyzed by oligonucleotide microarrays on 38 unique RNA Unsupervised and supervised clusterings were performed on a subset of 2849 genes that varied most significantly across the specimens. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for two of the significantly differentially expressed gene products was performed on tissue microarrays. Unsupervised clustering identified two discernable molecular BE profiles, one of which was similar to normal gastric tissue ("BE1"), and another that was shared by several of the AC specimens ("BE2"). The BE1 profile included expression of several genes that have been described as tumor-suppressor genes, most notably trefoil factor 1 (TFF-1). The BE2 profile included expression of genes previously found overexpressed in cancers, such as carboxylesterase-2 (CES-2). IHC demonstrated the loss of TFF-1 late in the progression of BE to AC. It also revealed CES-2 as being upregulated in AC documented to have arisen in the presence of BE. These potential biomarkers, as well as the relative expression of genes from BE1 versus those from BE2, may be validated in the future to aid in risk stratification and guide treatment protocols in patients with BE and associated AC.

Background: The ability to maintain DNA integrity is a critical cellular function. DNA repair is conducted by distinct pathways of genes, many of which are thought to be altered in colorectal cancer. However, there has been little characterization of these pathways in colorectal cancer. Method: By using theTaqMan real-time quantitative PCR, RNA expression profiling of 20 DNA repair pathway genes was done in matched tumor and normal tissues from 52 patients with Dukes' C colorectal cancer. Results: The relative mRNA expression level across the 20 DNA repair pathway genes varied considerably, and the individual variability was also quite large, with an 85.4 median fold change in the tumor tissue genes and a 127.2 median fold change in the normal tissue genes. Tumornormal differential expression was found in 13 of 20 DNA repair pathway genes (only XPA had a lower RNA level in the tumor samples; the other 12 genes had significantly higher tumor levels, all P < 0.01). Coordinated expression of ERCC6, HMG1, MSH2, and POLB (R S z 0.60) was observed in the tumor tissues (all P < 0.001). Apoptosis index was not correlated with expression of the 20 DNA repair pathway genes. MLH1 and XRCC1 RNA expression was correlated with microsatellite instability status (P = 0.045 and 0.020, respectively). An inverse correlation was found between tumor MLH1 RNA expression and MLH1 DNA methylation (P = 0.003). Conclusion: Our study provides an initial characterization of the DNA repair pathways for understanding the cellular DNA damage/repair system in human colorectal cancer.