Grazing is the most common land use type for grasslands, and grazing may alter the impacts of the predicted enhancement of nitrogen deposition on soil CH4 flux. To understand the effects of nitrogen addition, grazing, and their interactions on soil CH4 flux, we conducted a field study on CH4 flux in a meadow steppe in Northeast China from 2017 to 2018. We measured the soil CH4 flux and soil physiochemical and vegetation parameters. The studied meadow steppe soil acted as a CH4 source due to the legacy effects of an extreme rainfall event. During the experimental period, the average CH4 fluxes were 7.8 ± 1.0, 5.8 ± 0.5, 9.3 ± 0.9 and 7.6 ± 0.6 μg m-2 h-1 for the CK (control), G (grazing), N (nitrogen addition) and NG (grazing and nitrogen addition) treatments, respectively. The cumulative CH4 fluxes were 24.9 ± 2.6, 11.5 ± 4.9, 28.8 ± 4.2 and 17.8 ± 3.5 μg m-2 yr-1 for the CK, G, N and NG treatments, respectively. The N addition increased the average CH4 flux by 19%, and the grazing treatment reduced it by 25%. The soil CH4 flux was positively correlated with the 0–10 cm soil water filled pore space (P < 0.01), soil NH4+-N (P < 0.01) and soil NO3--N (P < 0.01), but negatively correlated with the 0–10 cm soil temperature (P < 0.01), except for the sampling dates that were strongly influenced by the extreme rainfall event. The average CH4 flux was significantly (P < 0.05) affected by the grazing and N addition treatments with the N addition treatment significantly (P < 0.05) increased the CH4 flux, whereas grazing significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the CH4 flux. Grazing offset the stimulating effects of N addition on CH4 flux, and there was no difference (P = 0.79) in the CH4 flux between the CK and NG plots. In summary, moderate grazing has the potential to reduce the negative impacts of N addition on CH4 flux and can increase the capacity of the soil CH4 sink in the studied meadow steppe.
In the context of global change, the frequency of precipitation pulses is expected to decrease while nitrogen (N) addition is expected to increase, which will have a crucial effect on soil C cycling processes as well as methane (CH4) fluxes. The interactive effects of precipitation pulses and N addition on ecosystem CH4 fluxes, however, remain largely unknown in grassland. In this study, a series of precipitation pulses (0, 5, 10, 20, and 50 mm) and long-term N addition (0 and 10 g N m-2 yr-1, 10 years) was simulated to investigate their effects on CH4 fluxes in a semi-arid grassland. The results showed that large precipitation pulses (10 mm, 20 mm, and 50 mm) had a negative pulsing effect on CH4 fluxes and relatively decreased the peak CH4 fluxes by 203-362% compared with 0 mm precipitation pulse. The large precipitation pulses significantly inhibited CH4 absorption and decreased the cumulative CH4 fluxes by 68-88%, but small precipitation pulses (5 mm) did not significantly alter it. For the first time, we found that precipitation pulse size increased cumulative CH4 fluxes quadratically in both control and N addition treatments. The increased soil moisture caused by precipitation pulses inhibited CH4 absorption by suppressing CH4 uptake and promoting CH4 release. Nitrogen addition significantly decreased the absorption of CH4 by increasing NH4+-N content and NO3–-N content and increased the production of CH4 by increasing aboveground biomass, ultimately suppressing CH4 uptake. Surprisingly, precipitation pulses and N addition did not interact to affect CH4 uptake because precipitation pulses and N addition had an offset effect on pH and affected CH4 fluxes through different pathways. In summary, precipitation pulses and N addition were able to suppress the absorption of CH4 from the atmosphere by soil, reducing the CH4 sink capacity of grassland ecosystems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.