Background: An effective treatment is needed for long-COVID patients which suffer from symptoms of vision and/or cognition impairment such as impaired attention, memory, language comprehension, or fatigue. Objective: Because COVID-19infection causes reduced blood flow which may cause neuronal inactivation, we explored if neuromodulation with non-invasive brain stimulation with microcurrent (NIBS), known to enhance blood flow and neuronal synchronization, can reduce these symptoms. Methods: Two female long-COVID patients were treated for 10–13 days with alternating current stimulation of the eyes and brain. While one patient (age 40) was infected with the SARS CoV-2 virus, the other (age 72) developed symptoms following AstraZeneca vaccination. Before and after therapy, cognition was assessed subjectively by interview and visual field using perimetry. One patient was also tested with a cognitive test battery and with a retinal dynamic vascular analyser (DVA), a surrogate marker of vascular dysregulation in the brain. Results: In both patients NIBS markedly improved cognition and partially reversed visual field loss within 3–4 days. Cognitive tests in one patient confirmed recovery of up to 40–60% in cognitive subfunctions with perimetry results showing stable and visual field recovery even during follow-up. DVA showed that NIBS reduced vascular dysregulation by normalizing vessel dynamics (dilation/constriction), with particularly noticeable changes in the peripheral veins and arteries. Conclusions: NIBS was effective in improving visual and cognitive deficits in two confirmed SARS-COV-2 patients. Because recovery of function was associated with restoration of vascular autoregulation, we propose that (i) hypometabolic, “silent” neurons are the likely biological cause of long-COVID associated visual and cognitive deficits, and (ii) reoxygenation of these “silent” neurons provides the basis of neurological recovery. Controlled trials are now needed to confirm these observations.
Purpose Vision loss in glaucoma is not only associated with elevated intraocular pressure and neurodegeneration, but vascular dysregulation (VD) is a major factor. To optimize therapy, an improved understanding of concepts of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (3PM) is needed which is based on a more detailed understanding of VD pathology. Specifically, to learn if the root cause of glaucomatous vision loss is of neuronal (degeneration) or vascular origin, we now studied neurovascular coupling (NVC) and vessel morphology and their relationship to vision loss in glaucoma. Methods In patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) (n = 30) and healthy controls (n = 22), NVC was studied using dynamic vessel analyzer to quantify retinal vessel diameter before, during, and after flicker light stimulation to evaluate the dilation response following neuronal activation. Vessel features and dilation were then related to branch level and visual field impairment. Results Retinal arterial and venous vessels had significantly smaller diameters in patients with POAG in comparison to controls. However, both arterial and venous dilation reached normal values during neuronal activation despite their smaller diameters. This was largely independent of visual field depth and varied among patients. Conclusions Because dilation/constriction is normal, VD in POAG can be explained by chronic vasoconstriction which limits energy supply to retinal (and brain) neurons with subsequent hypo-metabolism (“silent” neurons) or neuronal cell death. We propose that the root cause of POAG is primarily of vascular and not neuronal origin. This understanding can help to better personalize POAG therapy of not only targeting eye pressure but also vasoconstriction to prevent low vision, slowing its progression and supporting recovery and restoration. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, # NCT04037384 on July 3, 2019.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.