The objective was to identify the usefulness of heparin level by anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) assay vs activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT) or activated clotting time (ACT) in neonates undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A retrospective record review of 21 patients in the neonatal intensive care unit (mean ECMO initiation age, 2 days; range, 0-4 days; male/female ratio, 1:1) undergoing ECMO from 2006 to 2008 was performed. Linear regression correlations between anti-Xa, PTT, and ACT were determined by extrapolating PTT and ACT therapeutic ranges that corresponded with the ECMO heparin target range of 0.3 to 0.6 U/mL. Pearson correlation coefficients between heparin levels and PTT (-0.903 to 0.984), PTT less than 40 seconds after correction using PTT-heparinase (-0.903 to 1.000), and ACT (-0.951 to 0.891) in this patient population were widely variable. Inconsistency of PTT and ACT therapeutic ranges corresponding to heparin levels of 0.3 to 0.6 U/mL prompts a multifactorial approach to ECMO management because no single laboratory test can be used to determine appropriate anticoagulation management.

BackgroundCentral corneal thickness (CCT) can be measured by using contact and non-contact methods. Ultrasound pachymetry (US pachymetry) is a contact method for measuring CCT and is perhaps the most commonly used method. However, non-contact methods like scanning slit topography (Orbscan II), slit-lamp optical coherence tomography (SL-OCT), and specular microscopy are also used. Not many studies have correlated the measurement of CCT with all four modalities. The purpose of this study was to compare and correlate the CCT measurements obtained by US pachymetry with SL-OCT, specular microscopy, and Orbscan.MethodThis is a prospective, comparative study done in an institutional setting. Thirty-two eyes of 32 subjects with no known ocular disease and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 were enrolled. CCT measurements were obtained using SL-OCT, specular microscopy, scanning slit topography (Orbscan), and US pachymetry. Three measurements were made with each instrument by the same operator. Mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation were calculated for CCT measurements acquired by the four measurement devices. Bland–Altman plot was constructed to determine the agreements between the CCT measurements obtained by different equipment.ResultsThe mean CCT was 548.16±48.68 μm by US pachymetry. In comparison, CCT averaged 546.36±44.17 μm by SL-OCT, 557.61±49.92 μm by specular microscopy, and 551.03±48.96 μm by Orbscan for all subjects. Measurements by the various modalities were strongly correlated. Correlations (r2) of CCT, as measured by US pachymetry compared with other modalities, were: SL-OCT (r2=0.98, P<0.0001), specular microscopy (r2=0.98, P<0.0001), and Orbscan (r2=0.96, P<0.0001). All modalities had a linear correlation with US pachymetry measurements.ConclusionIn subjects with healthy corneas, SL-OCT, specular microscopy, and Orbscan (with correction factor) can be used interchangeably with US pachymetry in certain clinical settings. The four modalities showed significant linear correlations with one another.

No abstract