What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Haematuria is a symptom of urologic cancer particularly bladder cancer and timely diagnosis can prevent disease from progression to a more advanced or incurable stage. The ‘One Stop’ Haematuria clinic is the first rapid assessment clinic for haematuria in a public hospital in Western Australia. The results from this study have confirmed that it is an efficient and effective model in the streamlined care of patients with haematuria and provides evidence to support a more widespread adoption of this model of care. OBJECTIVE To report the prospective outcomes and clinic process for the first 500 patients at a new ‘one stop’ Haematuria Clinic (OSHC) in a Western Australian public hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS The first 500 patients who attended the weekly OSHC between May 2008 and February 2011 were included in this paper. Patients with haematuria were referred by various specialties. Gender, age, outcomes following OSHC attendance, diagnoses and wait times were recorded. RESULTS In all, 311 males and 189 females presented to the clinic with visible haematuria (296 cases) and microscopic haematuria (204 cases). Sixty‐six new cancers (13.2%) were diagnosed, 63 urological and three non‐urological. Fifty‐one patients (10.2%) were diagnosed with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Further breakdown of staging for bladder transitional cell carcinoma diagnoses were stage Ta (23 patients), stage T1 (21 patients) and stage 2–4 (seven patients). Sixty‐nine patients (13.8%) were diagnosed with urological pathologies requiring surgery. Thirty‐four patients (6.8%) were followed up by the nurse practitioner or continence advisors. In all, 61.2% of patients were discharged after a single visit to the OSHC. Excluding those requiring surgery only 3.4% patients required further urologist follow‐up. CONCLUSION The results have demonstrated that the first OSHC in a public Western Australian hospital is an efficient and effective model for the streamlined care of patients with haematuria. We encourage that similar models are adopted in other public hospitals in the region.
ObjectiveTo examine whether or not the combination of diclofenac suppository with peri-prostatic nerve block (PPNB) was effective in reducing the degree of pain experienced during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy in a randomised single-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients and MethodsIn all, 96 patients having a planned TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were randomised into one of the following arms on a 1:1 basis: 10 mL 1% lignocaine PPNB and placebo suppository (control) or 10 mL 1% lignocaine PPNB and 100 mg diclofenac suppository (treatment). Pain scores were recorded using the Numerical Rating Scale for pain (0-10) at the following time-points: (i) introduction of probe, (ii) during biopsy, (iii) 1 h after biopsy, (iv) later that evening (≈6 h after biopsy) and (v) 1 day after biopsy. Patients were asked about their preferred method for pain control if a repeat TRUS-guided prostate biopsy was required: local anaesthetic (LA) again or intravenous sedation. ResultsThere were no significant differences in age (P = 0.653) or PSA level (P = 0.584) between either study arm. The differences in pain scores between the control and treatment groups were not significant at Time 1 (probe insertion; P = 0.299), Time 2 (biopsy; P = 0.983), Time 4 (evening after; P = 0.231) and Time 5 (1 day after biopsy; P = 0.384). At Time 3 (1 h after biopsy), the control pain scale scores were statistically significantly higher than the treatment pain scale scores (P = 0.044). There was no difference between treatment (87%) and control (80%) groups as to whether they would prefer to repeat the biopsy under LA (P = 0.373). ConclusionThe use of a diclofenac suppository with PPNB did not show any clinically meaningful effect in decreasing pain or improving tolerability of TRUS-guided prostate biopsy and is not recommended. PPNB TRUS-guided biopsy is extremely well tolerated, with >80% of patients electing for subsequent LA biopsy if required.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.