ObjectiveTo construct and validate prediction models for the risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsPatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalized over the period between January 2010 and September 2018 were retrospectively collected. Eighteen baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were used as predictors to train five machine-learning models. The model that showed favorable predictive efficacy was evaluated at annual follow-ups. Multi-point data of the patients in the test set were utilized to further evaluate the model’s performance. We also assessed the relative prognostic importance of the selected risk factors for DR outcomes.ResultsOf 7943 collected patients, 1692 (21.30%) developed DR during follow-up. Among the five models, the XGBoost model achieved the highest predictive performance with an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.803, 88.9%, 74.0%, and 81.1%, respectively. The XGBoost model’s AUCs in the different follow-up periods were 0.834 to 0.966. In addition to the classical risk factors of DR, serum uric acid (SUA), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and triglyceride (TG) were also identified to be important and strong predictors for the disease. Compared with the clinical diagnosis method of DR, the XGBoost model achieved an average of 2.895 years prior to the first diagnosis.ConclusionThe proposed model achieved high performance in predicting the risk of DR among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at each time point. This study established the potential of the XGBoost model to facilitate clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and making type 2 diabetes management-related decisions.
Noninvasively and accurately predicting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status is a clinically vital problem. Moreover, further identifying the most suspicious area related to the EGFR mutation status can guide the biopsy to avoid false negatives. Deep learning methods based on computed tomography (CT) images may improve the noninvasive prediction of EGFR mutation status and potentially Manuscript
Background: Deep learning (DL) could predict isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status from MRIs. Yet, previous work focused on CNNs with refined tumor segmentation. To bridge the gap, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of developing a Transformer-based network to predict the IDH mutation status free of refined tumor segmentation. Methods: A total of 493 glioma patients were recruited from two independent institutions for model development (TCIA; N = 259) and external test (AHXZ; N = 234). IDH mutation status was predicted directly from T2 images with a Swin Transformer and conventional ResNet. Furthermore, to investigate the necessity of refined tumor segmentation, seven strategies for the model input image were explored: (i) whole tumor slice; (ii–iii) tumor mask and/or not edema; (iv–vii) tumor bounding box of 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.5 times. Performance comparison was made among the networks of different architectures along with different image input strategies, using area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC). Finally, to further boost the performance, a hybrid model was built by incorporating the images with clinical features. Results: With the seven proposed input strategies, seven Swin Transformer models and seven ResNet models were built, respectively. Based on the seven Swin Transformer models, an averaged AUC of 0.965 (internal test) and 0.842 (external test) were achieved, outperforming 0.922 and 0.805 resulting from the seven ResNet models, respectively. When a bounding box of 1.0 times was used, Swin Transformer (AUC = 0.868, ACC = 80.7%), achieved the best results against the one that used tumor segmentation (Tumor + Edema, AUC = 0.862, ACC = 78.5%). The hybrid model that integrated age and location features into images yielded improved performance (AUC = 0.878, Accuracy = 82.0%) over the model that used images only. Conclusions: Swin Transformer outperforms the CNN-based ResNet in IDH prediction. Using bounding box input images benefits the DL networks in IDH prediction and makes the IDH prediction free of refined glioma segmentation feasible.
The RF receive coil array has become increasingly vital in current MR imaging practice due to its extended spatial coverage, maintained high SNR, and improved capability of accelerating data acquisition. The performance of a coil array is intrinsically determined by the current patterns generated in coil elements as well as by the induced electromagnetic fields inside the object. Investigations of the ultimate performance constrained by a specific coil space, which defines all possible current patterns flowing within, offer the opportunity to evaluate coil-space parameters (i.e., coverage, coil-to-object distance, layer thickness, and coil element type) without the necessity of considering the realistic coil element geometry, coil elements layout, and number of receive channels in modeling. In this paper, to mimic 7-T monkey RF head coil design, seven hypothetical ultimate coil arrays with different coil-space configurations were mounted over a numerical macaque head model; by using Huygens's surface approximation method, the influences of coil-space design parameters were systematically investigated through evaluating the spatial constrained ultimate intrinsic SNR and ultimate g-factor. Moreover, simulations were also conducted by using four coil arrays with limited number of loop-only elements, in order to explore to what extent the ultimate coil performance can be achieved by using practical coil designs, and hence several guidelines in RF coil design for monkey brain imaging at 7 T have been tentatively concluded. It is believed that the present analysis will offer important implications in novel receive array design for monkey brain MR imaging at ultra-high field.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.