Understanding the host immune response during Zika virus (ZIKV) infection will provide valuable insights into ZIKV immunopathogenesis. In this study, characterization of cellular changes and immune mediators of ZIKV-infected patients was performed, allowing for the identification of key infection-associated markers.
Background. Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-Ab) have become increasingly prevalent in clinical settings and often result in significant morbidity and mortality due to their multidrug resistance (MDR). Here we present an integrated whole-genome sequencing (WGS) response to a persistent CR-Ab outbreak in a Brisbane hospital between 2016–2018. Methods. A. baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were sequenced using the Illumina platform primarily to establish isolate relationships based on core-genome SNPs, MLST and antimicrobial resistance gene profiles. Representative isolates were selected for PacBio sequencing. Environmental metagenomic sequencing with Illumina was used to detect persistence of the outbreak strain in the hospital. Results. In response to a suspected polymicrobial outbreak between May to August of 2016, 28 CR-Ab (and 21 other MDR Gram-negative bacilli) were collected from Intensive Care Unit and Burns Unit patients and sent for WGS with a 7 day turn-around time in clinical reporting. All CR-Ab were sequence type (ST)1050 (Pasteur ST2) and within 10 SNPs apart, indicative of an ongoing outbreak, and distinct from historical CR-Ab isolates from the same hospital. Possible transmission routes between patients were identified on the basis of CR-Ab and K. pneumoniae SNP profiles. Continued WGS surveillance between 2016 to 2018 enabled suspected outbreak cases to be refuted, but a resurgence of the outbreak CR-Ab mid-2018 in the Burns Unit prompted additional screening. Environmental metagenomic sequencing identified the hospital plumbing as a potential source. Replacement of the plumbing and routine drain maintenance resulted in rapid resolution of the secondary outbreak and significant risk reduction with no discernable transmission in the Burns Unit since. Conclusion. We implemented a comprehensive WGS and metagenomics investigation that resolved a persistent CR-Ab outbreak in a critical care setting.
Objectives Enterobacterales producing ESBL (ESBL-E) have been notable for their rapid expansion in community settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize evidence investigating the association between ESBL-E infection and adverse clinical outcomes, defined as bacteraemia, sepsis or septic shock, and all-cause mortality in adult patients. Methods Database search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE. In general, studies were screened for effect estimates of ESBL-E colonization or infection on clinical outcomes with non-ESBL-producing Enterobacterales as comparator, adult populations and molecular ascertainment of ESBL gene. Meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance heterogeneity model. Results Eighteen studies were identified, including 1399 ESBL-E and 3200 non-ESBL-E infected patients. Sixteen of these studies included only bacteraemic patients. Mortality was studied in 17 studies and ESBL-E infection was significantly associated with higher odds of mortality compared with non-ESBL-producing Enterobacterales infection (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.15–2.49, I2=58.3%). However, statistical significance did not persist when adjusted estimates were pooled (aOR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.52–5.39, I2=78.1%). Septic shock was studied in seven studies and all included only bacteraemic patients. No association between ESBL-E infection and shock was found (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.75–2.02, I2=14.8%). Only one study investigated the association between ESBL-E infection and bacteraemia. Conclusions Infections by ESBL-E appear to be significantly associated with mortality but not septic shock. Available studies investigating bacteraemia and shock as an intermediate outcome of ESBL-E infections are lacking. Future studies investigating the relationship between clinical outcomes and molecular characteristics of resistant strains are further warranted, along with studies investigating this in non-bacteraemic patients.
Background Early identification of bloodstream pathogens and their associated antimicrobial resistance may shorten time to optimal therapy in patients with sepsis. The BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel (BCID2) is a novel multiplex PCR detecting 43 targets directly from positive blood cultures, reducing turnaround times. Methods We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies to assess the BCID2 performance for pathogen identification and resistance markers detection compared to gold standard culture-based methods (including phenotypic and/or genotypic characterization). Results Nine studies were identified reporting data to build 2 × 2 tables for each BCID2 target, including 2005 blood cultures. The pooled specificity of the assay was excellent (> 97%) across most subgroups of targets investigated, with a slightly broader confidence interval for S. epidermidis (98.1%, 95% CI 93.1 to 99.5). Pooled sensitivity was also high for the major determinants of bloodstream infection, including Enterobacterales (98.2%, 95% CI 96.3 to 99.1), S. aureus (96.0%, 95% CI 90.4 to 98.4), Streptococcus spp. (96.7%, 95% CI 92.8 to 98.5), P. aeruginosa (92.7%, 95% CI 83.1 to 97.0), E. faecalis (92.3%, 95% CI 83.5 to 96.6), as well as blaCTX-M (94.9, 95% CI 85.7 to 98.3), carbapenemases (94.9%, 95% CI 83.4 to 98.6) and mecA/C & MREJ (93.9%, 95% CI 83.0 to 98.0). Sensitivity for less common targets was slightly lower, possibly due to their under-representation in the included studies. Conclusions BCID2 showed good performance for detecting major determinants of bloodstream infection and could support early antimicrobial treatment, especially for ESBL or carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli and methicillin-resistant S. aureus.
Acute respiratory infections are widespread in vulnerable populations of all ages and are characterized by a variety of symptoms. The underlying infection can be caused by a multitude of microorganisms, including viruses and bacteria. Early detection of respiratory infections through rapid pathogen screening is vital in averting infectious respiratory disease epidemics. This study utilized a multiplex real-time PCR system to develop a three-tube reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay, enabling simultaneously detect nine respiratory pathogens, including: influenza A and B, adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Streptococcus pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, Haemophilus influenzae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. This technique utilizes a one-step assay, with specifically designed TaqMan primer–probe sets combined in the same tube. This assay provided rapid and simplified detection of the nine prevalent pathogens, as well as increased sensitivity and reduced cross-contamination. This assay was evaluated using 25 related viral/bacterial strains as positive references, the other 25 irrelevant strains as negative controls, and clinical specimens from 179 patients. All positive strains were detected with no amplification of the non-target microorganism mixtures and the assay’s detection limits ranged between 250–500 copies/ml (1.25–2.5 copies/reaction). A total of 167 (93.3%) samples tested positive for at least one of the pathogens identified; 109 of these samples were from patients confirmed to have RSV infections. The diagnostic accuracy of our assay was further confirmed by matching results from classical direct immunofluorescence assay and nucleotide sequencing. These data demonstrate the innovative multiplex real-time PCR assay as a promising alternative to the current approaches used for early screening of acute respiratory infections.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.