Transcription by RNA polymerase (RNAP) is often regulated by interactions with control proteins to link specific gene expression to environmental signals and temporal cues. Often activators help recruit RNAP to promoters to increase initiation rates (Busby and Ebright 1999). In contrast, activity of the bacterial 54 containing RNAP holoenzyme is regulated at the DNA melting step (for review, see Buck et al. 2000). Hydrolysis of an NTP by an activator drives a change in configuration of the 54 -holoenzyme, converting the initial closed complex to an open complex to allow interaction with the template DNA for mRNA synthesis (Wedel and Kustu 1995). Preopening of DNA templates does not overcome the requirement for NTP hydrolysis by an activator to promote engagement of the holoenzyme with the melted DNA (Wedel and Kustu 1995;Cannon et al. 1999).The activators of 54 -holoenzyme are members of the large AAA+ protein family, which use ATP binding and hydrolysis to remodel their substrates (Neuwald et al. 1999;Cannon et al. 2000Cannon et al. , 2001. The greater part of the central domain of 54 activators corresponds to the AAA core structure, and includes ATP-binding and hydrolyzing determinants. The 54 protein is known to be the primary target for the NTPase of activators, but how activators use NTP binding and hydrolysis is not well understood (Cannon et al. 2000). Similarly, the nature of the interaction between 54 and the activator is not well described, but an interaction with 54 can be detected in the case of the DctD activator by protein cross-linking (Lee and Hoover 1995). Here we show that the use of ADP-aluminum fluoride, an analog of ATP that mimics ATP in the transition state for hydrolysis, allows formation of a stable complex among the activator PspF, the PspF and NifA central activating domains, and 54 . The binding assay was used to help define determinants in 54 and the activator needed for their interaction, and to show that binding can lead to an altered 54 -DNA footprint. The need for a transition-state analog of ATP for protein-protein binding is discussed in relation to the required ATPase activity of activators of 54 -dependent transcription. In particular, it seems that altered functional states of activators exist as ATP is hydrolyzed. This suggests a parallel to some switch and motor proteins that use nucleotide binding and hydrolysis to establish alternate functional states (Hirose and Amos 1999).

Summary Transcriptional activator proteins that act upon the σ54‐containing form of the bacterial RNA polymerase belong to the extensive AAA+ superfamily of ATPases, members of which are found in all three kingdoms of life and function in diverse cellular processes, often via chaperone‐like activities. Formation and collapse of the transition state of ATP for hydrolysis appears to engender the interaction of the activator proteins with σ54 and leads to the protein structural transitions needed for RNA polymerase to isomerize and engage with the DNA template strand. The common oligomeric structures of AAA+ proteins and the crea‐tion of the active site for ATP hydrolysis between protomers suggest that the critical changes in protomer structure required for productive interactions with σ54‐holoenzyme occur as a consequence of sensing the state of the γ‐phosphate of ATP. Depending upon the form of nucleotide bound, different functional states of the activator are created that have distinct substrate and chaperone‐like binding activ‐ities. In particular, interprotomer ATP interactions rely upon the use of an arginine finger, a situation reminiscent of GTPase‐activating proteins.

In bacteria, association of the specialized N protein with the core RNA polymerase subunits forms a holoenzyme able to bind promoter DNA, but unable to melt DNA and initiate transcription unless acted on by an activator protein. The conserved amino-terminal 50 amino acids of N (Region I) are required for the response to activators. We have used pre-melted DNA templates, in which the template strand is unpaired and accessible for transcription initiation, to mimic a naturally melted promoter and explore the function of Region I. Our results indicate that one activity of Region I sequences is to inhibit productive interaction of holoenzyme with pre-melted DNA. On pre-melted DNA targets, either activation of N -holoenzyme or removal of Region I allowed efficient formation of complexes in which melted DNA was sequestered by RNA polymerase. Like natural pre-initiation complexes formed on conventional DNA templates through the action of activator, such complexes were heparin-resistant and transcriptionally active. The inhibitory N Region I domain functioned in trans to confer heparin sensitivity to complexes between Region I-deleted holoenzyme and pre-melted promoter DNA. Evidence that Region I senses the conformation of the promoter was obtained from protein footprint experiments. We suggest that one function for Region I is to mask a single-strand DNA-binding activity of the holoenzyme. On the basis of extended DNA footprints of Region I-deleted holoenzyme, we also propose that Region I prevents RNA polymerase isomerization, a conformational change necessary for access to and the subsequent stable association of holoenzyme with melted DNA.

A central event in transcription is the assembly on DNA of specific complexes near the initiation sites for RNA synthesis. Activation of transcription by one class of enhancer-binding proteins requires an RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the specialized transcription factor, sigma-54 (sigma 54). We report here that sigma 54 alone specifically binds to promoter DNA and is responsible for many of the close contacts between RNA polymerase holoenzyme and promoter DNA, a property proposed for the major sigma 70 protein family. Binding of sigma 54 to promoter DNA is not equivalent to that of holoenzyme suggesting that there is a constraint on sigma 54 conformation when bound with core RNA polymerase. Footprints indicate sigma 54 is at the leading edge of DNA-bound holoenzyme. Like the holoenzyme, sigma 54-binding to promoter DNA does not result in DNA strand separation. Instead the specific DNA-binding activity of sigma 54 assists assembly of a closed promoter complex. This complex can be isomerized to the open (DNA melted) complex by activator protein, but promoter-bound sigma 54 alone cannot be induced to melt DNA. The pathway leading to productive transcription is similar to that proposed for eukaryotic RNA polymerase II systems.

No abstract