Fifty-five 6- to 7-month-old human infants were trained in an operant conditioning procedure, adapted from a procedure developed for 3-month-olds, in which kicks were reinforced by conjugate movement of a mobile. Retention was assessed in a simple forgetting paradigm (Expt. 1) or in a reactivation paradigm (Expt. 2) with either the training mobile or a different one serving as the retrieval cue. In Experiment 1, retention was tested 1, 7, 14, or 21 days after training. When the training and test mobiles were the same, infants exhibited virtually no forgetting for 14 days, but forgetting was complete by 21. When the training and test mobiles were different, infants exhibited no retention, discriminating the novel mobile for as long as they could remember the contingency. In Experiment 2, when the training mobile was presented as a reminder, the forgetting previously seen after 21 days was alleviated; when a different mobile was the reminder, it was not. These findings reveal that the efficacy of a reminder is predicted by the efficacy of that same stimulus in cuing the original memory 24 hr following training. Although the 6-month-olds learned more rapidly and remembered longer than infants half their age, their memory processing was described by the same basic principles.
A corollary of the law of effect predicts that the larger the reinforcement, the greater the rate of responding. However, an animal must eat more small portions than large portions to obtain the same daily intake, and one would predict, therefore, that when eating smaller portions an efficient animal would eat less (conserving time and energy) and/or respond faster (conserving time). The latter of these predictions was supported by the present experiments with free-feeding rats for which portion size (pellet size or duration of feeder presentation) and portion price within meals were varied. Response rate was a function of the unit price (responses/g) of food: Rats responded faster when portions were smaller or when prices were higher. Meal size and frequency were relatively unaffected by unit price, but were influenced by the price of meal initiation. The results are discussed in relation to the economic differences between traditional operant and free-feeding paradigms and to both traditional and more recent formulations of the law of effect.
The developmental maturity of hatchling birds varies greatly across the altricial-precocial continuum and these differences are related to the relative proportions of yolk and albumen in a species' egg. In general, the more precocial the chick the greater the proportion of yolk in its egg. Egg composition can also vary within species with unknown consequences for the developing embryo. The present research sought to determine the importance of egg composition to avian development by experimentally removing 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 16% of the albumen from eggs of domestic fowl (Gallus gallus). Experimental chicks were paired to control chicks whose eggs were matched on the basis of original mass and laid by the same female but no albumen was removed from their eggs prior to incubation. Decreased levels of albumen significantly decreased chick size at hatch. Experimental subjects, however, had similar growth to controls after 20 days of ad-lib access to food, although sex differences between pairs indicated that the growth of females may be affected differentially by albumen removal. Righting responses were retarded in experimental subjects for the 2 and 4% albumen-removal groups. Egg composition can have important consequences for chick survival simply by influencing body size at hatch and it is suggested that the practice of using overall egg size as a measure of egg "quality" needs to be broadened by considering what is inside the egg as well. In addition, the unique opportunity presented by using an avian model to assess directly the specific influences of protein (albumen) and of fat (yolk) on growth and behavioral development is explored.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.