Objective: Psychological crossover is the interpersonal transfer of stress. Details of how this transfer actually occurs are scarce, causing difficulties for advancement of crossover research. Crossover research has also suffered from a sampling bias, traditionally assessing the extent to which a husband's work stressors are transferred to his wife. Clearly, with the advent of both dualincome and dual-career partners, this research sampling method requires updating. The research reported here directly addresses these two issues and reports on an original model mapping the crossover process. Method: The research adopted a qualitative method of enquiry in order to explore the crossover process afresh. Dyadic interviews were conducted with 16 dualearner couples who were both employed full time. Results: Template analysis of the transcribed data revealed the existence of both negative (e.g., strain) and positive (e.g., well-being) crossover experiences between the couples. These crossover experiences followed a five-step process: (1) work event experienced; (2) impact of work event;(3) transfer of impact to partner; (4) impact on partner's well-being and work performance; and (5) dyadic outcomes. Conclusions: This research advances recent discussions of the crossover process by supporting the five-step Crossover Process Model. The findings support the occurrence of both negative and positive crossover of emotions, although negative work stressors were found to be the most commonly experienced initiator of crossover. Importantly, this research demonstrated that neither the gender of the initiating partner nor the gender of the recipient partner significantly influenced the crossover process.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.