INTRODUCTION: There are many potential barriers to adequate cancer pain management, including lack of physician education and prescription monitoring programs. The authors surveyed physicians about their specific knowledge of pain management and the effects of the regulation of opioids on their prescribing practices. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed out to British Columbia physicians who were likely to encounter cancer patients. The survey asked for physicians' opinions about College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia regulation and other issues related to their prescribing practices, and assessed basic knowledge of cancer pain management. RESULTS: There was a 69% return rate with a total of 4618 evaluable responses. There was a significant difference among medical disciplines, years in practice, number of chronic pain patients seen and size of community of practice. The highest knowledge scores were achieved by oncologists and the lowest scores were from surgeons. Those who practiced in smaller communities had a higher average knowledge score. Those who felt their knowledge about cancer pain was inadequate scored lower than those who felt their knowledge was adequate. The questions most frequently answered incorrectly (or by "don't know") were those about equianalgesic dosing (68%) and adequate breakthrough dosing (45%), revealing knowledge deficiencies that would significantly impair a physician's ability to manage cancer pain. CONCLUSIONS: The details of opioid prescribing are crucial areas to target education for cancer pain management. The surveyed physicians accepted the need for regulation of opioid prescribing with very few being fearful of scrutiny from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia. However, the inconvenience of the triplicate prescription pad was more of a barrier to prescribing, it being of concern to 20% of respondents, particularly surgeons and medical specialists.Key Words: Cancer; Opioids; Pain; Physicians; Prescribing; Regulation Sondage sur les connaissances de la prise en charge des douleurs causées par le cancer et sur les attitudes des médecins britannocolombiens à cet égard INTRODUCTION : Il existe de nombreux obstacles potentiels à une prise en charge convenable de la douleur, y compris le manque de formation des médecins et de programmes de surveillance pharmaceutique. Les auteurs ont interrogé les médecins au sujet de leurs connaissances précises de la prise en charge de la douleur et des effets des règlements sur les opiacés sur leurs pratiques de prescription. MÉTHODOLOGIE : Un questionnaire a été posté aux médecins britannocolombiens susceptibles de voir des patients cancéreux. On y demandait l'avis des médecins quant au règlement du collège des médecins et chirurgiens de la Colombie-Britannique, on y posait d'autres questions reliées à leurs pratiques de prescription et on y évaluait leurs connaissances fondamentales de la prise en charge des douleurs causées par le cancer. RÉSULTATS : Le taux de retour a été de 69 %, pour un total de 4 618...

ABSTRACT. There is increasing support for the use of cannabis in terminal illness. Sixty-eight patients from a palliative population were surveyed for their attitudes and beliefs about the use of cannabis in terminal illness.

Patient acuity, team expertise, perceived burden to patients, and time commitment all influenced staff's recommendation not to implement the ESAS-r tool on the palliative care unit.