Student employment has been treated as a homogeneous category in studying the effects of doing part-time jobs on student academic performance or social life. In the present study, using data collected from a well-known public university in Macau, we treat student employment as a heterogeneous experience and compare the relative importance of various characteristics of student employment in predicting student academic performance and social life. We find that doing parttime jobs exerts no effect on student academic performance when it is treated as a homogeneous category. When treated as a heterogeneous experience, we find that incentives to work have most effects on student academic performance, followed by whether the jobs provide opportunities for students to develop skills and whether the jobs are related to their fields of study. Inconsistent with most previous studies, we find that doing part-time jobs actually enriches students' school life and increases their social support network as well. We do find that taking part-time jobs damages students' relationships with their parents.

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to examine the level of patient satisfaction with nursing care and identify the factors affecting satisfaction from the inpatient’s perspective in a backward region of China.DesignThis was a cross-sectional study.SettingThe study was conducted at a tertiary hospital located in northwest China.ParticipantsPatients admitted to the ward for at least 48 hours were chosen to participate in the survey.Primary outcome measureThe Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Care Scale was used. Data were collected from 219 patients.ResultsThe overall inpatient satisfaction with nursing care was 78.15±4.74. Patients were more satisfied with nurses who respected their privacy and treated them as individuals (67.7%). Patients were least satisfied with the type of information nurses gave them (11.7%) and with the sufficient awareness of their needs. Patients who were married, had a history of hospitalisation, surgery and were taken charge of by junior nurses had higher satisfaction.ConclusionsThe overall level of patient satisfaction was moderate. Patient-centred individualised care and providing sufficient information model of care are needed. There was a need for nurses to be aware of patients’ individualised care needs and to provide them with more information. This study may suggest/urge hospital administrators, policymakers and nurses to be more sensitive with patients’ married status, history of hospitalisation and surgery, the professional title of in charged nurses when care is provided. Ultimately to achieve better outcome of patients’ hospitalisation.

No abstract

A 54-year-old women presented with a one-year history of frequent micturition, urgent urination and odynuria. Laboratory tests showed leukocyturia and microscopic hematuria. A computed tomography scan revealed a bone exostosis extending posteriorly from the right pubic bone into the bladder (Picture).During the surgery, the mass extending from the right pubic bone into the bladder was identified histologically as an osteochondromas, and was removed. The patient was discharged free of symptoms after the operation. At two months follow-up, no recurrent symptoms were observed. Osteochondroma is the most common benign bone tumor; however, pubis locations are very rare (1). To our knowledge, a case of irritative voiding symptoms caused by a pubic osteochondroma eroding into the bladder has not been previously reported. The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).

Background As a practice-oriented discipline, strict adherence to reporting guidelines is particularly important in randomized controlled trial (RCT) abstracts of the nursing area. However, whether abstract reports after 2010 have complied with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Abstracts (CONSORT-A) guideline is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether the publication of CONSORT-A has improved abstract reporting in nursing and explores the factors associated with better adherence to the guidelines. Methods We searched the Web of Science for 200 RCTs randomly selected from ten nursing journals. We used a data extraction form based on CONSORT-A, including 16 items, to analyze the reporting adherence to the guidelines, and the reporting rate of each item and the total score for each abstract were used to indicate adherence and overall quality score (OQS, range 0–16). A comparison of the total mean score between the two periods was made, and affecting factors were analyzed. Results In the studies we included, 48 abstracts were published pre-CONSORT-A whereas 152 post-CONSORT-A. The overall mean score for reporting adherence to 16 items was 7.41 ± 2.78 and 9.16 ± 2.76 for pre- and post-CONSORT-A, respectively (total score: 16). The most poorly reported items are “harms (0%),” “outcomes in method (8.5%),” “randomization (25%),” and “blinding (6.5%).” Items including the year of publication, impact factor, multiple center trial, word count, and structured abstract are significantly associated with higher adherence. Conclusions The adherence to abstract reporting in nursing literature has improved since the CONSORT-A era, but the overall completeness of RCT abstracts remained low. A joint effort by authors, editors, and journals is necessary to improve reporting quality of RCT abstracts.