No abstract

Supratentorial extraventricular ependymomas (STEEs) are relatively rare ependymomas, and their pathologic and genetic characteristics are still poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the histologic, immunohistochemical, and RELA fusion features, as well as to clarify in more detail the clinical courses of STEEs. Data from a total of 43 patients with STEEs was analyzed retrospectively. The status of RELA fusion was evaluated using fluorescence in situ hybridization. The expression levels of L1CAM, p65, cyclin D1, and p53 were assessed using immunohistochemistry. Progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated via Kaplan-Meier estimation using the log-rank test. Among all 43 STEEs, 65.1% (28/43) are positive for RELA fusion. Interestingly, almost half of the patients with RELA fusion–positive ependymomas are adults (13/28), and 89.3% (25/28) cases are anaplastic ependymomas, which suggests that RELA fusion testing is necessary in adults with STEEs. We investigated the immunohistochemical status of p65, L1CAM and CCND1 protein expression for their ability to predict RELA fusion status. RELA fusion–positive STEEs are frequently associated with expression of p65 (85.2%), L1CAM (85.2%), and CCND1 (81.5%). The accuracy of predicting RELA fusion status was much higher when the expression of p65 and L1CAM was combined, that is, when both were immunopositive. The status of RELA fusion, p53 overexpression, and extent of tumor resection are significantly associated with prognosis.

No abstract

Overexpression of GOLPH3 (Golgi phosphoprotein 3, 34 kDa) is associated with the progression of many solid tumor types leading to an unfavorable clinical outcome. The present study examined the association between GOLPH3 expression and tumor development, clinicopathological factors, and prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. GOLPH3 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry in 18 normal ovarian samples, 28 benign tumors, 55 serous borderline ovarian tumors, and 135 epithelial ovarian carcinomas. The association of GOLPH3 expression with clinical characteristics, response to chemotherapy, and overall survival of epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients was analyzed on fresh tissue samples. GOLPH3 mRNA and protein expression in ovarian cancer and normal ovarian tissues were detected by real-time quantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. The results are the following: (1) GOLPH3 immunostaining localized to the cytoplasm in two patterns, condensed into large granules with perinuclear distribution, and dispersed in the cytoplasm as fine granules. (2) GOLPH3 expression was higher in epithelial ovarian carcinoma than in normal ovarian tissues at the mRNA and protein level. The frequency of high-level expression of GOLPH3 increased progressively from benign (cystadenoma) to borderline neoplasms to malignant lesions. (3) Dispersed cytoplasmic GOLPH3 expression in epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients was highly correlated with FIGO stage (p < 0.001), tumor histological grade (p = 0.003), lymph node involvement (p = 0.001), and chemotherapy response (p = 0.034). (4) A dispersed pattern of GOLPH3 expression was an independent prognostic factor for poor overall survival. Patients with low dispersed cytoplasmic GOLPH3 expression had significantly longer overall survival than patients with high dispersed cytoplasmic expression. In contrast, GOLPH3 condensed expression was not correlated with clinicopathological features, chemotherapy response, or prognosis. GOLPH3 gene expression might play a role in tumorigenesis in epithelial ovarian carcinoma as upregulation of GOLPH3 expression is associated with a more aggressive tumor phenotype. GOLPH3 immunohistochemistry may be of value to predict the outcome of ovarian carcinoma patients.

Though many studies were published to assess the relationship between p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and cervical cancer, there was no definite conclusion on this association. To provide a quantitative assessment of the relationship between p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and cervical cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of 10 eligible studies (1,539 cases and 2,161 controls). All those 10 studies were from Asians. The odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association, and the pooled ORs were calculated for the codominant model (ArgArg vs. SerSer), the dominant model (ArgArg/SerArg vs. SerSer), and the recessive model (ArgArg vs. SerSer/SerArg). Meta-analysis of those 10 studies showed that there was no association between p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and cervical cancer risk in Asians under all three models (ArgArg vs. SerSer: OR = 1.04, 95%CI 0.66-1.65, P = 0.86, I(2) = 78%; ArgArg/SerArg vs. SerSer: OR = 0.93, 95%CI 0.66-1.30, P = 0.66, I(2) = 81%; ArgArg vs. SerSer/SerArg: OR = 1.20, 95%CI 0.84-1.73, P = 0.32, I(2) = 72%). Sensitivity analysis performed by omitting each study in turn showed that the pooled results were stable. In summary, there is no association between p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and cervical cancer risk in Asians. Further studies are needed to assess the possible association between p21 Ser31Arg polymorphism and cervical cancer risk in Caucasians.