No abstract

The Tat

The twin‐arginine translocation (Tat) system translocates folded proteins across biological membranes. It has been suggested that the Tat system of Escherichia coli can direct Tat substrates to degradation if they are not properly folded [Matos, C.F., Robinson, C. and Di Cola, A. (2008) The Tat system proofreads FeS protein substrates and directly initiates the disposal of rejected molecules. EMBO J. 27, 2055–2063; Matos, C.F., Di Cola, A. and Robinson, C. (2009) TatD is a central component of a Tat translocon‐initiated quality control system for exported FeS proteins in Escherichia coli. EMBO Rep. 10, 474–479]. Contrary to the earlier reports, it is now concluded that reported differences between tested strains were due to variations in expression levels and inclusion body formation. Using the native Tat substrate NrfC and a malfolded variant thereof, we show that the turnover of these proteins is not affected by the absence of all known Tat components. Malfolded NrfC is degraded more quickly than the native protein, indicating that Tat‐independent protease systems can recognize malfolded Tat substrates.

Folded proteins can be translocated across biological membranes via the Tat machinery. It has been shown in vitro that these Tat substrates can interact with membranes prior to translocation. Here we report a monolayer and infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopic (IRRAS) study of the initial states of this membrane interaction, the binding to a lipid monolayer at the air/water interface serving as a model for half of a biological membrane. Using the model Tat substrate HiPIP (high potential iron-sulfur protein) from Allochromatium vinosum, we found that the precursor preferentially interacts with monolayers of negatively charged phospholipids. The signal peptide is essential for the interaction of the precursor protein with the monolayer because the mature HiPIP protein showed no interaction with the lipid monolayer. However, the individual signal peptide interacted differently with the monolayer compared to the complete precursor protein. IRRA spectroscopy indicated that the individual signal peptide forms mainly aggregated β-sheet structures. This β-sheet formation did not occur for the signal peptide when being part of the full length precursor. In this case it adopted an α-helical structure upon membrane insertion. The importance of the signal peptide and the mature domain for the membrane interaction is discussed in terms of current ideas of Tat substrate-membrane interactions.