Regarding the issue of intense mining pressure appearing in the underlying gateway below the remaining coal pillar in the close‐distance coal seam (the remaining coal pillar is perpendicular to the underlying section coal pillar), 401 working face is used as the engineering background. Field measurements, laboratory experiments, numerical simulations, and engineering verification techniques are used to study the abutment pressure's evolution properties and the plastic zone's propagation laws before and after the underlying coal seam roadway experienced the mining impact. The conclusions are as follows: ① The maximum plastic area on the two sides and the roof of the roadway underlying the gob are up to 2 and 1.5 m, whereas the maximum plastic area on the two sides and the roof of the roadway underlying the remaining coal pillar are up to 5 and 4.5 m, respectively. Moreover, the plastic area extends along the two sides, and the section coal pillar is completely broken when the working face is mined below the remaining coal pillar. ② The stress increase coefficient K in the overlap area of the remaining coal pillar and the underlying section coal pillar reaches 3.4 when the mining face penetrates the underlying remaining coal pillar and the advance abutment pressure is overlaid with the concentrated stress of the coal pillar. ③ When the underlying working face is mined to 4, −2, −8, and −14 m away from the remaining coal pillar, the damage range of the roadway 5–10 m ahead increases in turn. At the same time, the maximum plastic area of the roof passes through the plastic area of the upper coal seam floor. Therefore, the underlying and transition areas on both sides of the remaining coal pillar are divided into Area I (15 m) → Area II (the most complicated area to control under the remaining coal pillar, 20 m) → Area III (25 m) according to the width. Furthermore, the divisional differentiated combined control technology of channel steel truss anchor cable with joint double‐way locking control function of roof and coal pillar in Areas I and III, while channel steel truss anchor cable with joint double‐way locking control function of roof and side + high resistance integral door‐type support is proposed in Area II. Field engineering practice shows that the deformation of the roadway surrounding rock can be controlled within 210 mm after adopting the above divisional combined control technology. Finally, the mining operation can safely and efficiently pass through the remaining coal pillar. The research results have important reference values for surrounding rock control of mining roadways in the overlapping area of similar “+”‐type cross‐working face.

China has abundant coal resources, and the distribution of coal seams is complex. Thick coal seams account for more than 45% of all coal seams. Fully mechanized top coal caving mining has the advantages of large production, high efficiency, and low cost. In fully mechanized caving mining, especially in fully mechanized caving mining of extra-thick coal seams, the mining space is ample, the mine pressure is severe, and the roadway maintenance is complex. As a result, it is necessary to summarize and discuss the gob-side entry driving of fully mechanized caving in theory and technology, which will help to promote the further development of fully mechanized caving gob-side entry driving technology. First, in recent years, the research hotspots of gob-side entry driving have focused on the deformation mechanism and the control method of the roadway surrounding rock. Secondly, this paper discusses the theoretical models of the “triangle-block” and “beam” for the activity law of the overlying strata in gob-side entry driving, including the lateral breaking “large structure” model, compound key triangle block structure model in the middle and low position, the high and low right angle key block stability mechanics model, elastic foundation beam model, low-level combined cantilever beam + high-level multilayer masonry beam structure model, and the vertical triangular slip zone structure model. It introduces the “internal and external stress field theory” and the “stress limit equilibrium zone model”. Thirdly, it summarizes several numerical simulation analysis methods in different conditions or research focuses and selects appropriate constitutive models and simulation software. Finally, it introduces surrounding rock control technology, including two ribs, the roof, and under challenging conditions. It provides a method reference for support in similar projects.

In response to the large-scale instability failure problem of designing coal pillars and support systems for gob-side entry driving (GSED) in high-stress soft coal seams in deep mines, the main difficulties in the surrounding rock control of GSED were analyzed. The relationship between the position of the main roof breaking line, together with the width of the limit equilibrium zone and a reasonable size for the coal pillar, were quantified through theoretical calculations. The theoretical calculations showed that the maximum and minimum widths of the coal pillar are 8.40 m and 5.47 m, respectively. A numerical simulation was used to study the distribution characteristics and evolution laws of deviatoric stress and plastic failure fields in the GSED surrounding rock under different coal pillar sizes. Theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and engineering practice were comprehensively applied to determine a reasonable size for narrow coal pillars for GSED in deep soft coal seams, which was 6.5 m. Based on the 6.5 m coal pillar size, the distribution of deviatoric stress and plastic zones in the surrounding rock of the roadway, at different positions of the advanced panel during mining, was simulated, and the range of roadway strengthening supports for the advanced panel was determined as 25 m. The plasticization degree of the roof, entity coal and coal pillar, and the boundary line position of the peak deviatoric stress zone after the stability of the excavation were obtained. Drilling crack detection was conducted on the surrounding rock of the GSED roof and rib, and the development range and degree of the crack were obtained. The key areas for GSED surrounding rock control were clarified. Joint control technology for surrounding rock is proposed, which includes a combination of a roof channel steel anchor beam mesh, a rib asymmetric channel steel truss anchor cable beam mesh, a grouting modification in local fractured areas and an advanced strengthening support with a single hydraulic support. The engineering practice showed that the selected 6.5 m size for narrow coal pillars and high-strength combined reinforcement technology can effectively control large deformations of the GSED surrounding rock.