BackgroundSurgical masks (SMs) are used to reduce bacterial shedding from the mouth, nose and face. This study aimed to investigate whether SMs may be a potential source of bacterial shedding leading to an increased risk of surgical site infection.MethodsBacterial contamination of the SMs was tested by making an impression of the external surface of the mask on sterile culture media immediately. We investigated the difference in bacterial counts between the SMs worn by surgeons and those placed unused in the operating room (OR), and the bacterial count variation with indicated wearing time. Moreover, the difference in bacterial counts on the external surface between the first and second layers of double-layered SMs was also assessed.ResultsThe bacterial count on the surface of SMs increased with extended operating times; significant difference was found between the 4- to 6-hour and 0-hour groups (p < 0.05). When we analysed the bacterial counts from the same surgeon, a significant increase was noted in the 2-hours group. Moreover, the bacterial counts were significantly higher among the surgeons than the OR. Additionally, the bacterial count of the external surface of the second mask was significantly higher than that of the first one.ConclusionsThe source of bacterial contamination in SMs was the body surface of the surgeons rather than the OR environment. Moreover, we recommend that surgeons should change the mask after each operation, especially those beyond 2 hours. Double-layered SMs or those with excellent filtration function may also be a better alternative.The translational potential of this articleThis study provides strong evidence for the identification that SMs as source of bacterial contamination during operative procedures, which should be a cause for alarm and attention in the prevention of surgical site infection in clinical practice.
BackgroundEfficacious bone substitute is essential for the treatment of a critical size bone defect. Currently, the bone substitutes commonly used in clinical practice lack osteogenic capacity and the therapeutic efficacy is not ideal. Herein, a novel stem cell screen-enrich-combine(−biomaterials) circulating system (SECCS) was introduced to provide the substitutes with osteogenic ability. The stem cell screening, enrichment, and recombination with substitutes could be integrated during the surgical operation. Using SECCS, the bioactive mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and porous β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) composites (MSCs/β-TCP) were rapidly prepared for critical size bone defect repair and validated in goat models of critical size tibia defects.MethodsTwelve goats with right hind limb tibia defects of 30 mm were randomly divided into two groups: six (the experimental group) were treated with MSCs/β-TCP prepared by SECCS and the other six goats (the control group) were treated with pure porous β-TCP. The repair effect was assessed by x-ray, computed tomography (CT), micro-CT, histology and histomorphology 6 months after the operation. In addition, the enrichment efficacy of MSCs and the characteristics of the MSCs/β-TCP prepared by SECCS were evaluated.ResultsThe SECCS could compound about 81.3 ± 3.0% of the MSCs in bone marrow to the porous β-TCP without affecting the cell viability. The average number of MSCs for retransplantation was 27,655.0 ± 5011.6 for each goat from the experimental group. In vitro, satisfactory biocompatibility of the MSCs/β-TCP was performed, with the MSCs spreading adequately, proliferating actively, and retaining the osteogenic potential. In vivo, the defect repair by MSCs/β-TCP with good medullary cavity recanalization and cortical remodeling was significantly superior to that of pure porous β-TCP.ConclusionsThe MSCs/β-TCP prepared through SECCS demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy in goat models of critical size bone defect. This provides a novel therapeutic strategy for critical size bone defects caused by severe injury, infection, and bone tumor resection with a high profile of safety, effectiveness, simplicity, and ease.
Bone non-union after fracture, considered a therapeutic challenge for orthopedics, always needs a reversion surgery, including autograft transplantation (AGT). However, adverse events related to autograft harvest cannot be ignored. Our group designed a novel system called the bone marrow stem cell Screen-Enrich-Combine Circulating System (SECCS) by seeding mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) during surgery to thereafter rapidly process bioactive bone implantation. In this retrospective case-control study, 30 non-union patients who accepted SECCS therapy and 20 non-union patients who accepted AGT were enrolled. By SECCS therapy, the MSC-enriched β-TCP particles were implanted into the non-union gap. During the enrichment procedure, a significant proportion of MSCs were screened and enriched from bone marrow into porous β-TCP particles, and the cells possessed the capacity for three-line differentiation and were CD90+/CD105+/CD34-/CD45-. Approximately 82.0±10.7% of MSCs were enriched from 60 mL bone marrow without damaging cell viability, and approximately 11,444.0±6,018 MSCs were transplanted per patient. No implant-related infections occurred in any case. After 9 months of follow-up, 27 patients (90%) in the SECCS group acquired clinical union, compared with 18 patients (90%) in the AGT group (clinical union time, P = 0.064), and postoperative radiographic union score at 9 months post-operation was similar between the two groups. In conclusion, the SECCS could concentrate a large proportion of MSCs from bone marrow to acquire enough effective cells for therapy without in vitro cell culture. Bone substitutes processed by SECCS demonstrated encouraging promotion of bone regeneration and showed a satisfactory clinical curative effect for diaphyseal bone non-union, which was non-inferior to AGT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.