Background Compared with traditional tendon repair teaching methods, using a virtual reality (VR) simulator to teach tendon suturing can significantly improve medical students’ exercise time, operation flow and operation knowledge. At present, the purpose of this study is to explore the long-term influence of VR simulator teaching on the practice performance of medical students. Method This is a one-year long-term follow-up study of a randomized controlled study. A total of 117 participants who completed the initial study were invited to participate in the follow-up study. Participants in the VR group and the control group were required to complete a questionnaire developed by the authors and the teachers in the teaching and research department and to provide their surgical internship scores and Objective Structure Clinical Examination(OSCE) graduation scores. Results Of the 117 invitees, 108 completed the follow-up. The answers to the questions about career choice and study habits were more positive in the VR group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The total score for clinical practice in the VR group was better than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the OSCE examination, the scores for physical examination, suturing and knotting and image reading were higher in the VR group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion The results of the one-year long-term follow-up indicated that compared with medical students experiencing the traditional teaching mode, those experiencing the VR teaching mode had more determined career pursuit and active willingness to learn, better evaluations from teachers in the process of surgical clinical practice, and better scores in physical examination, suturing and knotting and image reading in the OSCE examination. In the study of nonlinear dynamics to cultivate a good learning model for medical students, the VR teaching model is expected to become an effective and stable initial sensitive element. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry(25/05/2021, ChiCTR2100046648); http://www.chictr.org.cn/hvshowproject.aspx?id=90180.

No abstract

Because the application of intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC‐ECG)‐guided peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the treatment of neonates is controversial in terms of phlebitis reduction compared with traditional X‐ray positioning technique, a systematical evaluation is needed on the impact of IC‐ECG on this common complication following PICC. Literature retrieval was conducted on large databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, and CNKI. Randomised controlled trials (RTCs) of intracavitary electrocardiogram‐guided peripherally inserted central catheter tip placement in the treatment of neonates up to July 7, 2022, were collected. Then indicators of included studies were compared and analysed by two researchers. Meta‐analysis was performed on the STATA 17.0 software. After excluding invalid trials, 11 out of 316 randomised controlled trials were included for further analysis. Meta‐analysis results showed that compared with the control group, IC‐ECG‐guided PICC could decrease the incidence of phlebitis ( I 2 = 0.00%, P = 0.76, OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.19–0.56) and that no significant difference was observed between preterm neonates and term neonates ( P = 0.74). Meanwhile, total complications were decreased in neonates ( I 2 = 0.00%, P = 0.00 OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.16–0.33). IC‐ECG‐guided PICC could also improve the accuracy of optimal tip location ( I 2 = 0.00%, P = 0.53, OR = 5.37, 95% CI 3.80–7.59). IC‐ECG‐guided PICC could achieve reduced phlebitis incidence and total complications in the treatment of neonates, as well as increased accuracy of optimal tip location, no matter if those neonates were preterm or not. This study was registered in inplasy.com with No. INPLASY202280012 (DOI: 10.37766/inplasy2022.8.0012).

Computer‐assisted orthopedic system (CAOS) is rapidly gaining popularity in the field of precision medicine. However, the cost‐effectiveness of CAOS has not been well clarified. We performed this review to summarize and assess the cost‐effectiveness analyses (CEAs) with regard to CAOS. Publications on CEA in CAOS have been searched in PubMed and CEA Registry up to May 31, 2022. The Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument was used to estimate the quality of studies. Relationships between qualities and potential factors were also examined. There were 15 eligible studies in the present review. Twelve studies evaluated CAOS joint arthroplasties and found that CAOS joint arthroplasties were cost‐effective compared to manual methods. Three studies focused on spinal surgery, two of which analyzed the cost‐effectiveness of CAOS for patients after spinal fusion, with conflicting results. One study demonstrated that CAOS was cost‐effective in spinal pedicle screw insertion. The mean QHES score of CEAs included was 86.1. The potential factors had no significant relationship with the quality of studies. Based on available studies, our review reflected that CAOS was cost‐effective in the field of joint arthroplasty. While in spinal surgery, the answer was unclear. Current CEAs represent high qualities, and more CEAs are required in the different disciplines of orthopedics where CAOS is employed.

Background: To explore the clinical effect of combined hip–knee joint exercise compared with traditional postoperative rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods: In a prospective, single-blind randomized controlled trial, 60 female patients with osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral TKA were randomly divided into three groups: a resistive intervention group, a nonresistive intervention group and a control group. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) values, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)-12 values, isokinetic muscle strength, and gait test results were measured and recorded preoperatively, two weeks postoperatively and three months postoperatively.Results: With the preoperative evaluation as baseline, the resistive hip–knee joint exercise group had lower functional scores and stronger quadriceps femoris and hip abductor muscles than the nonresistive group (p<0.05 for both). Both hip–knee exercise groups had stronger quadriceps femoris, hip abductor and hip rotator muscles than the control group (p<0.05). Two weeks postoperatively, both hip–knee strength training groups had lower functional scores than the control group (p<0.05) but stronger quadriceps femoris and external hip rotator muscles (p<0.05). Preoperative and 2-week postoperative gait analysis revealed that combined hip–knee strengthening could increase step length (p<0.05) and the ability to stand on the affected limb (p<0.05).Conclusion: A 12-week regimen of combined hip–knee exercises could improve the function of the affected limb after TKA, the movement patterns of the knee joint during gait, and the therapeutic effect of TKA and accelerate patients’ rehabilitation. The effect of combined hip–knee exercises positively correlated with increases in exercise load.