In a prospective multi-center observational study, we evaluated the frequency, severity, and impact on activities of daily living (ADL) of adverse effects (AEs) of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with a relapse. Online self-report questionnaires stating IVMP’s most common AEs were completed at baseline, the 2nd day of treatment, and 1 day and 1 week after treatment. Eighty-five patients were included, 66 completed the baseline questionnaire, and 59 completed at least one post-baseline questionnaire. Patients reported on average 4 (median) AEs; two (3.4 %) reported no AE. Most frequent was change in taste (61 %), facial flushing (61 %), sick/stomach pain (53 %), sleep disturbance (44 %), appetite change (37 %), agitation (36 %), and behavioral changes (36 %). Of all AEs, 34.3 % were severe and 37.9 % impacted on ADL. A 3-day course resulted in 4 (median) AEs and a 5-day course in 7. All patients with high disease impact had two or more AEs, compared with 79 % of those with low impact (p < 0.01). Of patients with high disability, 45 % had severe AEs, compared with 16 % of those with low disability. Severe central nervous system (CNS)-related AEs occurred two times more frequently in patients with high disease impact, and two-and-a-half times more frequently in patients with high disability. Therefore, in virtually all patients, high-dose IVMP leads to AEs, with about one of three AEs being severe with impact on ADL. Patients with high disease impact or high disability may experience more (severe) AEs, due to a higher occurrence of severe CNS-related AEs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00415-016-8183-3) contains supplementary material.
The objective of the present investigation was to characterize the in vivo EEG effects of (synthetic) neuroactive steroids on the basis of a recently proposed mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. After intravenous administration, the time course of the EEG effect of pregnanolone, 2-3␣-5␣-3-hydroxy-2-(2,2-dimethylmorpholin-4-yl)-pregnan-11,20-dione (ORG 21465), 2-3␣-5␣-21-chloro-3-hydroxy-2-(4-morpholinyl)-pregnan-20-one (ORG 20599), and alphaxalone was determined in conjunction with plasma concentrations in rats. For each neuroactive steroid the PK/PD correlation was described on the basis of a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with an effect compartment to account for hysteresis. The observed concentration EEG effect relationships were biphasic and characterized with a mechanism-based pharmacodynamic model, which is based on a separation between the receptor activation process and the stimulus-response relationship. A single unique biphasic stimulus-response relationship could be identified for all neuroactive steroids, which was successfully described by a parabolic function. The receptor activation process was described by a hyperbolic function. Estimates for the maximum activation (e PD ) were similar for the different neuroactive steroids but values of the potency estimate (K PD ) ranged from 157 Ϯ 16 ng ⅐ ml Ϫ1 for pregnanolone, 221 Ϯ 83 ng ⅐ ml Ϫ1 for ORG 20599, and 483 Ϯ 42 ng ⅐ ml Ϫ1 for alphaxalone to 1619 Ϯ 208 ng ⅐ ml Ϫ1 for ORG 21465. A statistically significant correlation was observed between the in vivo potency and the IC 50 in an in vitro [ 35 S]t-butylbicyclophosphorothionate binding assay (r ϭ 0.91). It is concluded that the new PK/PD model constitutes a new mechanism-based approach to the quantification of the effects of (synthetic) neuroactive steroids in vivo effects. The results show that the neuroactive steroids differ in potency but not in intrinsic efficacy at the GABA A receptor in vivo.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.