(1) Background: To determine the importance of diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) in the staging process of patients with suspected head and neck carcinomas. (2) Methods: A total of 30 patients (24 male, 6 female) with a median age of 67 years with clinically suspected head and neck carcinoma with pathologic cervical nodal swelling in ultrasound underwent the staging procedure with computed tomography (CT) and whole-body MRI including DWIBS. (3) Results: In a total of 9 patients, abnormalities in the routine work-up of pretherapeutic staging were found. Five cases of either secondary cancer or distant metastases were only visible in DWIBS, while being missed on CT. One diagnosis was only detectable in CT and not in DWIBS, whereas three diagnoses were recognizable in both modalities. (4) Conclusions: DWIBS in addition to a standard neck MRI in cervical lymphadenopathy suspicious for head and neck cancer yielded additional clinically relevant diagnoses in 17% of cases that would have been missed by current staging routine procedures. DWIBS offered a negative predictive value of 98.78% for ruling out distant metastases or secondary malignancies.
(1) Background: Early-stage glottic cancer is easily missed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may improve diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, our aim was to assess the value of adding diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) to pre-therapeutic MRI staging. (2) Methods: Two radiologists with 8 and 13 years of experience, blinded to each other’s findings, initially interpreted only standard MRI, later DWIBS alone, and afterward, standard MRI + DWIBS in 41 patients with histopathologically proven pT1a laryngeal cancer of the glottis. (3) Results: Detectability rates with standard MRI, DWIBS only, and standard MRI + DWIBS were 68–71%, 63–66%, and 73–76%, respectively. Moreover, interobserver reliability was calculated as good (κ = 0.712), very good (κ = 0.84), and good (κ = 0.69) for standard MRI, DWIBS only, and standard MRI + DWIBS, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Standard MRI, DWIBS alone, and standard MRI + DWIBS showed an encouraging detection rate, as well as distinct interobserver reliability in the diagnosis of early-stage laryngeal cancer when compared to the definitive histopathologic report.
BACKGROUND: Cervical lymphadenopathy can be benign or malignant. Its accurate diagnosis is necessary to determine appropriate treatment. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies (US-CNBs) are frequently used as a percutaneous sampling approach. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to identify the efficacy and safety of US-CNBs in 125 patients with cervical lymphadenopathy and clinically suspected head and neck cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic with limited surgical resources. METHODS: US-CNBs of pathological lymph nodes were performed in 146 lymph nodes on 125 patients. Biopsies were performed ultrasound-guided with a reusable gun core biopsy system and a 10-cm-long 16-G needle. Standard of reference for the histological findings were panendoscopy, clinical and sonographic follow-up, surgical biopsy or a repeat US-CNB. RESULTS: Adequate material for histologic diagnosis was obtained in 111 patients (89%), of these 83 patients (75%) were diagnosed as malignant, whereas benign lymphadenopathy accounted for 28 patients (25%). Therefore, US-CNB was able to identify malignant or benign lymphadenopathy with an overall accuracy of 88% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous US-CNB is a safe and effective alternative to surgical biopsy in the management of cervical lymphadenopathy in patients with clinically suspected head and neck cancer in a setting with limited resources.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.