Understanding three‐dimensional (3D) root traits is essential to improve water uptake, increase nitrogen capture, and raise carbon sequestration from the atmosphere. However, quantifying 3D root traits by reconstructing 3D root models for deeper field‐grown roots remains a challenge due to the unknown tradeoff between 3D root‐model quality and 3D root‐trait accuracy. Therefore, we performed two computational experiments. We first compared the 3D model quality generated by five state‐of‐the‐art open‐source 3D model reconstruction pipelines on 12 contrasting genotypes of field‐grown maize roots. These pipelines included COLMAP, COLMAP+PMVS (Patch‐based Multi‐View Stereo), VisualSFM, Meshroom, and OpenMVG+MVE (Multi‐View Environment). The COLMAP pipeline achieved the best performance regarding 3D model quality versus computational time and image number needed. In the second test, we compared the accuracy of 3D root‐trait measurement generated by the Digital Imaging of Root Traits 3D pipeline (DIRT/3D) using COLMAP‐based 3D reconstruction with our current DIRT/3D pipeline that uses a VisualSFM‐based 3D reconstruction on the same dataset of 12 genotypes, with 5–10 replicates per genotype. The results revealed that (1) the average number of images needed to build a denser 3D model was reduced from 3000 to 3600 (DIRT/3D [VisualSFM‐based 3D reconstruction]) to around 360 for computational test 1, and around 600 for computational test 2 (DIRT/3D [COLMAP‐based 3D reconstruction]); (2) denser 3D models helped improve the accuracy of the 3D root‐trait measurement; (3) reducing the number of images can help resolve data storage problems. The updated DIRT/3D (COLMAP‐based 3D reconstruction) pipeline enables quicker image collection without compromising the accuracy of 3D root‐trait measurements.

Understanding three-dimensional (3D) root traits is essential to improve water uptake, increase nitrogen capture, and raise carbon sequestration from the atmosphere. However, quantifying 3D root traits by reconstructing 3D root models for deeper field-grown roots remains a challenge due to the unknown tradeoff between 3D root-model quality and 3D root-trait accuracy. Therefore, we performed two computational experiments. We first compared the 3D model quality generated by five state-ofthe-art open-source 3D model reconstruction pipelines on 12 contrasting genotypes of field-grown maize roots. These pipelines included COLMAP, COLMAP+PMVS (Patch-based Multi-view Stereo), VisualSFM, Meshroom, and OpenMVG+MVE (Multi-View Environment). The COLMAP pipeline achieved the best performance regarding 3D model quality versus computational time and image number needed. Thus, in the second test, we compared the accuracy of 3D root-trait measurement generated by the Digital Imaging of Root Traits 3D pipeline (DIRT/3D) using COLMAP-based 3D reconstruction with our current DIRT/3D pipeline that uses a VisualSFM-based 3D reconstruction (Liu et al., 2021) on the same dataset of 12 genotypes, with 5˜10 replicates per genotype. The results revealed that, 1) the average number of images needed to build a denser 3D model was reduced from 3000˜3600 (DIRT/3D [VisualSFM-based 3D reconstruction]) to 300˜600 (DIRT/3D [COLMAP-based 3D reconstruction]); 2) denser 3D models helped improve the accuracy of the 3D root-trait measurement; 3) reducing the number of images can help resolve data storage capacity problems. The updated DIRT/3D (COLMAP-based 3D reconstruction) pipeline enables quicker image collection without compromising the accuracy of 3D root-trait measurements.