Uhrig for helpful comments during development of this study. Ted C. Schroeder and three anonymous reviewers also provided insightful suggestions during the review process.

No abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 128.226.37.5 on Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:59:05 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and ConditionsABSTRACT. While agricultural land preservation programs seek to maximize the number of acres, to preserve productive farms, to preserve contiguous farms, and to preserve threatened farms, they are often evaluated solely on the number of acres preserved. Preserved parcels in four Maryland counties were evaluated to determine how well programs traded off the four goals using a Farrell efficiency analysis approach. Comparisons are made between the types of programs. Of the four objectives, parcel size and productivity measures were the most likely to affect the efficiency measures. In addition, purchase of development right programs were most successful in trading off objectives. (JEL Q24, Q15)

No abstract

No abstract