Church choirs, marching bands, choruses, and orchestras do not fully satisfy the musical appetites of the young. Hundreds of thousands of American youth want more. Their drive, their enthusiasm, their creativity, and their enormous fund of talent have produced new music-vibrant, original, and honest. Young people's music can be held at bay outside the institutions of society as it largely is at present, or it can be recognized as a vital and welcome new regenerative force and invited to assume a respectable position in the American musical culture. Music educators are now asked to decide if continuity of a proud but restricted tradition is more important than open experimentation with a wide spectrum of music. Shall we continue to relegate Beethoven, Mozart, Bach, and Brahms to the permanent role of being America's greatest composers? Do we support the practice of reserving our concert halls only for the "high" art, thus assuring that the "people's" art be forced into barrooms and pop festivals?
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.