Association entre le temps d'écoute de la télévision et le rendement scolaire des enfants et des adolescents : Recension systématique et méta-analyse des études longitudinales réalisées à ce jour.

Research has focused on the relations between television (TV) viewing time and children’s reading achievement. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain this relation. The substitution hypothesis proposes that TV viewing distracts students from activities that are important for their learning. The inhibition hypothesis proposes that watching television inhibits important affective/cognitive skills. In this study, we test both hypotheses by estimating the relation between TV viewing time and reading achievement. We use the frequency of students’ leisure reading and the frequency of interactions between students and their parents as potential mediators to test the substitution hypothesis, whereas for the inhibition one, we use students’ intrinsic motivation to read and their level of inattention. Data come from the Québec Longitudinal Study of Child Development (QLSCD). Designed by the Institut de la statistique du Québec, QLSCD covers a wide range of themes. The QLSCD is representative of children in Québec and contains 2223 participants who were followed from 0 to 21 years old. The four structural models tested are built as follows: the TV viewing time at 6 years old predicts the four mediating variables at 8 years old, which in turn predicts reading achievement at 10 years old. In addition, we have tested models’ gender invariance. Results indicate that TV viewing time is not directly or indirectly associated with reading achievement. Specifically, it is not associated with the mediating variables of child-parent interactions, intrinsic motivation, and inattention. However, the frequency of leisure reading is negatively associated with the time spent watching TV. This association is very small (−0.07) and has no indirect effect on reading achievement. Finally, results do not vary according to the gender of the participants. Our results are in line with those of previous studies in the field and cast some doubts on the potential negative effects of TV viewing time on reading achievement.

Background Health measurement guides policies and health care decisions are necessary to describe and attain the quintuple aim of improving patient experience, population health, care team well-being, health care costs, and equity. In the primary care setting, patient-reported outcome measurement allows outcome comparisons within and across settings and helps improve the clinical management of patients. However, these digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are still not adapted to the clinical context of primary health care, which is an indication of the complexity of integrating these tools in this context. We must then gather evidence of their impact on chronic disease management in primary health care and understand the characteristics of effective implementation. Objective We will conduct a systematic review to identify and assess the impact of electronic PROMs (ePROMs) implementation in primary health care for chronic disease management. Our specific objectives are to (1) determine the impact of ePROMs in primary health care for chronic disease management and (2) compare and contrast characteristics of effective ePROMs’ implementation strategies. Methods We will conduct a systematic review of the literature in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Methods Group and in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for its reporting. A specific search strategy was developed for relevant databases to identify studies. Two reviewers will independently apply the inclusion criteria using full texts and will extract the data. We will use a 2-phase sequential mixed methods synthesis design by conducting a qualitative synthesis first, and use its results to perform a quantitative synthesis. Results This study was initiated in June 2022 by assembling the research team and the knowledge transfer committee. The preliminary search strategy will be developed and completed in September 2022. The main search strategy, data collection, study selection, and application of inclusion criteria were completed between October and December 2022. Conclusions Results from this review will help support implementation efforts to accelerate innovations and digital adoption for primary health care and will be relevant for improving clinical management of chronic diseases and health care services and policies. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42022333513; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=333513 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/48155

BACKGROUND Health measurement guides policies and healthcare decisions and is necessary to describe and attain the quintuple aim of improving patient experience, population health, care team well-being, healthcare costs and equity. In the primary care setting, patient-reported outcome measurement allows outcomes comparison within and across settings, and the improvement of clinical management of patients. However, these digital patient-reported outcomes measures are still not adapted to the clinical context of primary healthcare, an indication of the complexity of integrating these tools in this context. We must then gather evidence of their impact on chronic disease management in primary healthcare and understand the characteristics of effective implementation. OBJECTIVE We will conduct a systematic review to identify and assess the impact of ePROMs implantation in primary health care for chronic disease management. Our specific objectives are: (1) Determine the impact of ePROMs in primary health care for chronic disease management. (2) Compare and contrast characteristics of effective ePROMs’ implementation strategies. METHODS We will conduct a systematic review of the literature according to the Cochrane Methods Group and in compliance with the PRISMA Guidelines for its reporting. A specific search strategy was developed for relevant databases to identify studies. Two reviewers will independently apply the inclusion criteria using the full texts and extract the data. We will use a two-phase sequential mixed methods synthesis design by conducting a qualitative synthesis first, and use its results to perform a quantitative synthesis. RESULTS The timeline for the project has started in June 2022 by putting together the research team and the knowledge transfer committee. The preliminary search strategy will be developed and completed in September 2022. The main search strategy, data collection, study selection and application of inclusion criteria will be completed from October to December 2022. CONCLUSIONS Results from this study will help support implementation efforts to accelerate innovations and digital adoption for primary healthcare and will be relevant for improving clinical management of chronic diseases, healthcare services and policies. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO Systematic Review Registry (ID: CRD42022333513)