Background: Overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is associated with increased angiogenesis, growth and invasion in solid tumors, and hematologic malignancies. The expression of isoforms of VEGF, which mediate different effects, can be discriminated by splice-variant-specific quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), but current methods have only modest sensitivity and precision and suffer from heteroduplex formation.
Methods: We used a real-time RT-PCR assay on the LightCycler system. Applicability for detection of different VEGF mRNAs and total VEGF message was tested on seven healthy tissues (each pooled from healthy donors) and seven correlated malignant tissues. Results were normalized to β2-microglobulin mRNA. Amplification of VEGF splice variants was performed exclusively with variant-specific reverse primers, whereas forward primer and fluorescent probe were common to obtain similar RT-PCR kinetics.
Results: Highly specific detection of VEGF splice variants was achieved with minor intra- and interassay variation (<0.22 threshold cycle). Total VEGF expression was higher in malignant tissues. In healthy tissues, the mRNA encoding diffusible variants VEGF121 and VEGF165 constituted on average 78% (SD = 9.3%) of the total VEGF message, and the cell-adherent variant VEGF189 constituted on average 22% (SD = 5.4%). In contrast, in malignant tissues VEGF121 and VEGF165 accounted for 94% (SD = 7.6%) and VEGF189 only 6% (SD = 3.7%).
Conclusions: Because of the ability for quantification of VEGF splice variants with high specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility, this new LightCycler assay is superior to conventional semiquantitative competitive RT-PCR and immunological assays and may contribute to better understanding of VEGF-mediated angiogenesis.
No statistically significant differences in treatment efficacy were detected between 20 Gy IF radiotherapy and 1X (COPP + ABVD) chemotherapy following CR after six cycles of alternating chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage HD. However, limited observations in a non-randomized cohort indicate that patients without consolidation treatment of CR after 6 cycles of chemotherapy may have an elevated risk of relapse.
PURPOSE To determine the appropriate irradiation dose after four cycles of modern combination chemotherapy in nonbulky involved field (IF/BF) and noninvolved extended-field (EF/IF) sites in patients with intermediate-stage Hodgkin's disease (HD). MATERIALS AND METHODS HD patients in stage I to IIIA with a large mediastinal mass, E stage, or massive spleen involvement were treated with two double cycles of alternating cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (COPP) plus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by EF irradiation in two successive trials (HD1 and HD5). In the HD1 trial (1983 to 1988), 146 patients who responded to chemotherapy were randomized to receive 20 Gy (70 patients) or 40 Gy (76 patients) of EF irradiation in all fields outside bulky disease sites. A cohort of 111 patients who fulfilled the same inclusion criteria in the subsequent trial HD5 (1988 to 1993) were treated with 30 Gy. Bulky disease always received 40 Gy. RESULTS Freedom-from-treatment-failure (FFTF) and survival (SV) curves showed no differences between the 20-, 30-, and 40-Gy groups. However, acute toxicities were more frequent in the 40-Gy arm. Analysis of relapse patterns showed that 18 of 26 relapsing patients either failed to respond in initial bulky sites (n = 5) or had an extranodal relapse (n = 9) or both (n = 4). After 5 years, the cumulative risk for relapse in bulky sites is 10%, despite 40 Gy of radiation. CONCLUSION Our results strongly suggest that there is no relevant radiotherapy dose effect in the range between 20 Gy and 40 Gy in IF/BF and EF/IF after 4 months of modern polychemotherapy in patients with intermediate-stage HD. Relapse patterns indicate that patients destined to relapse need more systemic, rather than local, treatment. Based on our data, we conclude that 20 Gy is sufficient in EF/IF of intermediate-stage HD following four cycles of modern polychemotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.