No abstract

this is the study protocol for a scoping review regarding the ABCDE approach used by health care professionals . The main question we aim to answer is: What are the reported outcomes related to application or teaching of the ABCDE approach by healthcare professionals in a hospital setting?

This is a scoping review protocol considering published surveillance definitions of nosocomial infections in newborns

Group Name: Working Group on Neonatal Infectious Diseases of the Section of Neonatology of the Dutch Paediatric SocietyBackground: Central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a main focus of infection prevention and control initiatives in neonatal care. Standardized surveillance of neonatal CLABSI enables intra- and interfacility comparisons, which can contribute to quality improvement. To date, there is no national registration system for CLABSI in neonatal care in the Netherlands. Across neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), several different sets of CLABSI criteria and surveillance methods are used for local monitoring of CLABSI incidence rates. To achieve standardized CLABSI surveillance, we conducted a consensus procedure with regard to nationwide neonatal CLABSI surveillance criteria. Method: A modified Delphi consensus procedure for the development of nationwide neonatal CLABSI surveillance criteria was performed between January 2016 and January 2017 in the Netherlands. An expert panel was formed by members of the Working Group on Neonatal Infectious Diseases of the Section of Neonatology of the Dutch Paediatric Society. The consensus procedure consisted of 3 expert panel rounds. Figure 1 shows a detailed description of the consensus procedure. Result: The expert panel achieved consensus on Dutch neonatal CLABSI surveillance criteria, which are summarized in Figure 2. Neonatal CLABSI is defined as a bloodstream infection occurring >72 hours after birth, associated with an indwelling central venous or arterial line and laboratory confirmed by 1 or more blood cultures. In addition, the blood culture finding should not be related to an infection at another site and one of the following criteria can be applied: (1) a bacterial or fungal pathogen is identified from 1 or more blood cultures; (2) the patient has clinical symptoms of sepsis and (2A) a common commensal is identified in 2 separate blood cultures or (2B) a common commensal is identified by 1 blood culture and C-reactive protein (CRP) level is >10 mg/L in the first 36 hours following blood culture collection. Conclusion: The newly developed Dutch neonatal CLABSI surveillance criteria are concise, are specific to the neonatal population, and comply with a single blood-culture policy in actual neonatal clinical practice. International agreement upon neonatal CLABSI surveillance criteria is needed to identify best practices for infection prevention and control.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

Background Cardiovascular instability is common in critically-ill children. There is scarcity of published high-quality studies to develop meaningful evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring guidelines and hence, with the exception of management of shock, currently there are no published guidelines for hemodynamic monitoring in children. The European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Cardiovascular Dynamics section aimed to provide expert consensus recommendations on hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children. Methods Creation of a panel of experts in cardiovascular hemodynamic assessment and hemodynamic monitoring and review of relevant literature - a literature search was performed, and recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLA voting method. The AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document. Results Of 100 suggested recommendations across 12 subgroups concerning hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children, 72 reached “strong agreement”, 20 “weak agreement” and 2 had “no agreement”. Six statements were considered as redundant after rephrasing of statements following first round of voting. Due to lack of published evidence to develop evidence-based guidelines, most of the recommendations are based upon expert consensus. Conclusions These expert consensus-based recommendation may be used to guide clinical practice for hemodynamic monitoring in critically-ill children and they may serve as a basis for highlighting gaps in the knowledge base to guide further research in hemodynamic monitoring.