Vascular disrupting agents (VDAs), or endothelial disrupting agents, attempt to exploit the vascular endothelium that supplies rapidly dividing neoplasms. Unlike antiangiogenesis agents (e.g. the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab; and tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib and sunitinib) that disrupt endothelial cell survival mechanisms and the development of a new tumor blood supply, VDAs are designed to disrupt the already established abnormal vasculature that supports tumors, by targeting their dysmorphic endothelial cells. Tumor vascular endothelium is characterized by its increased permeability, abnormal morphology, disorganized vascular networks, and variable density. VDAs induce rapid shutdown of tumor blood supply, causing subsequent tumor death from hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. The safety profile of this class of compounds is more indicative of agents that are indeed 'vascularly' active. For example, VDAs can cause: acute coronary and other thrombophlebitic syndromes; alterations in blood pressure, heart rate, and ventricular conduction; transient flush and hot flashes; neuropathy; and tumor pain. Despite these cardiovascular concerns some patients have benefited from VDAs in early clinical trials. Further drug development of VDAs must include the combination of these agents with other novel biological agents, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Close monitoring of patients receiving VDAs for any cardiovascular toxicity is imperative.

As the threshold nucleated cell dose for single unit umbilical cord blood (UCB) in adults has not to date been firmly established, we prospectively compared single vs. 2-unit UCB transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in adult patients with hematologic malignancies. Study design specified one UCB unit if the cryopreserved total nucleated cell (TNC) dose was ≥2.5×10 7 /kg recipient weight, otherwise 2-units matched at minimum 4/6 HLA loci to the patient and 3/6 to each other were infused. Twenty-seven patients received 1 unit; 23 patients received 2 units. Median time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >500/μL was 24 days (95% CI 22–28 days), 25 days for 1-unit and 23 days for 2-units (p=0.99). At day 100, ANC >500/μL was 88.4% and 91.3% in the 1 and 2-unit groups (p=0.99), respectively. Three-year event free survival (EFS) was 28.6% and 39.1% in the 1 and 2-unit groups (p=0.71), respectively. Infusion of 2 units was associated with significantly lower relapse risk, 30.4% vs. 59.3% (p=0.045). Infused cell doses (TNC, CD3 + , CD34 + , CD56 + CD3 neg ) did not impact engraftment, overall survival (OS), or EFS. Taken together, single unit UCB transplantation with threshold cell dose ≥2.5×10 7 /kg recipient weight after RIC is a viable option for adults, although infusion of 2 units confers a lower relapse incidence.

No abstract