The identification of formations in anisotropic reservoirs using seismic reflection data and logging data may lead to misrepresentations of the actual formations. Lithofacies discrimination intrinsically has ambiguity, and the depositional sequences of the study area comprise shales, fine-grained sands, and silts. So it needs to reduce the uncertainty of the lithofacies discrimination using anisotropic parameters. This study proposes an approach involving seismic anisotropic parameters to discriminate between different lithofacies. We calculate four anisotropic parameters (ε, δ, γ, η) from logging data (V
p, V
s, and density) and then employ these for lithofacies discrimination. We compared our results to lithofacies discrimination based on traditional parameters such as V
p/V
s ratio, clay volume, and water saturation. Using field data from Muglad Basin in South Sudan, we show how the suggested parameters could be used to identify eleven zones with distinct lithofacies. According to the anisotropic parameters, the lithofacies discrimination results are similar to other logging data, and it is easier to separate the lithofacies than petrophysical data. Furthermore, we introduce a new parameter, i.e., the difference between the normalized anisotropic δ parameter and clay volume, which can be used as a possible indicator for heavy oil reservoirs. The new parameter matches well with water saturation in the field data application.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.