Several recent pilot studies combined Global Positioning System (GPS) technology with travel survey data collection to evaluate opportunities for improving the quantity and accuracy of travel data. These studies used GPS to supplement traditional data elements collected in paper or electronic travel diaries. Although many traditional trip elements can be obtained from the GPS data, trip purpose has remained an important element, requiring the use of a diary to continue. Presented are the results of a proof-of-concept study conducted at the Georgia Institute of Technology that examined the feasibility of using GPS data loggers to completely replace, rather than supplement, traditional travel diaries. In this approach, all GPS data collected must be processed so that all essential trip data elements, including trip purpose, are derived. If this processing is done correctly and quickly, then the computer-assisted telephone interview retrieval call could be shortened significantly, reducing both respondent burden and telephone interview times. The study used GPS data loggers to collect travel data in personal vehicles. The GPS data were then processed within a geographic information system (GIS) to derive most of the traditional travel diary elements. These derived data were compared with data recorded on paper diaries by the survey participants and were found to match or exceed the reporting quality of the participants. Most important, this study demonstrated that it is feasible to derive trip purpose from the GPS data by using a spatially accurate and comprehensive GIS.
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology can continuously monitor the time and location of vehicle usage. By recording and analyzing detailed vehicle activity data, researchers can analyze the safety and environmental implications of driver behavior and trip-making patterns. In 2000, NHTSA awarded the Georgia Institute of Technology a contract to equip 1,100 vehicles with a GPS-enhanced device to collect speed and location data. The objective was to acquire more accurate information on the role of excessive speed on crash frequency and severity. GPS technology allows the researcher to continuously measure driver speed, acceleration, and location. When merged with roadway characteristics within a geographic information system (GIS) environment, determinations of driver risk-taking behavior can be made. Second, continuous logging of GPS data allows researchers to capture high-resolution vehicle activity immediately before a crash event, reducing the potential error and bias introduced during determination of precrash speed estimates. Until May 1, 2000, the military degraded the position accuracy of GPS signals for commercial use, known as selective availability. For researchers, life without selective availability is a great improvement. Travel routes can clearly be discerned without the addition of differential correction units. The accuracy of speed, acceleration, and position data obtained from GPS signals for use in determining driver performance parameters without selective availability were tested. The test included four GPS packages, both corrected and uncorrected, simultaneously validated against a distance-measuring instrument. Equipment configuration, data collection methods, and sources of error are reported. The results suggested that non-corrected data can be used to obtain data within a reasonable range of the application requirements. Even without selective availability, GPS accuracy is still problematic in urban canyons and under heavy tree canopies. Although filtering for urban canyon outliers is labor intensive in a continuous monitoring situation, improvements in GIS hold promise for automation of this task.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.