The Sepsis-3 criteria was the most predictive, followed by the American Burn Association and Mann-Salinas criteria. However, no criterion alone had the accuracy to be a diagnostic standard within this burn population. We recommend sepsis is clinically assessed, diagnosed, and documented prospectively by the burn team, and not by the application of retrospective criteria.
Four microporous virus-adsorbent filter media for recovering low levels of virus from 380 liters of drinking water were compared. In addition, two of the filter media were compared with 1,900 liters of drinking water. The filter media evaluated were MF nitrocellulose membranes (293 mm), AA Cox M-780 epoxy-fiberglass-asbestos disks (267 mm), K-27 yarn-wound fiberglass cartridges + AA Cox M-780 disks (127 mm), and Balston epoxy-fiberglass tubes (24.5 by 63.5 mm). The filters were used to concentrate seeded poliovirus from 380 liters of finished drinking water. Sodium thiosulfate was added to the drinking water to neutralize chlorine, and hydrochloric acid was added to adjust the pH to 3.5. Virus was eluted from the filters with glycine-NaOH buffer at pH 11.5. In terms of virus recovery efficiency, the filter media ranked Balston > Cox 267-mm > MF 293-mm g K-27 + Cox 127-mm, but differences were slight. The Balston filters and holders were also superior to the other systems in terms of size, weight, cost, and handling factors. Experiments with 2and 8-,gm porosity Balston filters showed no statistically significant difference in virus recovery. Virus was readily detected by the Balston and the MF 293-mm systems at input levels of 12 to 22 PFU/1,900 liters. Preliminary experiments indicated that an elution pH lower than 11.5 may be satisfactory.
BackgroundImmune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is becoming an increasingly prevalent strategy in the clinical realm of cancer therapeutics. With more patients being administered ICB for a host of tumor types, the scope of adverse events associated with these drugs will likely grow. Here we report a case of aplastic anemia (AA) in a patient with metastatic melanoma secondary to dual ICB therapy. To our knowledge, this is only the second case of AA secondary to dual ICB in the literature, and the first to have a positive patient outcome.Case presentationA 51-year old male with metastatic melanoma was started on dual immune checkpoint blockade, in the form ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) and nivolumab (1 mg/kg). Two weeks following the second cycle, he presented to the emergency department with profound polypipsia, polyuria and fatigue. The patient was diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis secondary to immune therapy induced type-1 diabetes and was admitted to the ICU. While in hospital the patient developed a symptomatic anemia and neutropenia. A bone marrow biopsy revealed a markedly hypocellular marrow with trinlineage hypoplasia with no evidence of myelodysplasia, neoplasm or excess blasts. Flow cytometry revealed an inverted CD4+:CD8+ ratio and an absence of hematogones. Taken together the presumed etiology was AA secondary to immunotherapy. The patient was subsequently started in IV methylprednisone 70 mg/day for 8 days, followed by a prednisone taper. This intervention rectified the bicytopenia and to date the patient has shown stable blood counts.ConclusionWith the use of ICBs becoming increasingly prevalent in the clinical arena, the number of patients presenting with immune-related adverse events will likely increase. The current case illustrates the need to be vigilant when managing cancer patients receiving ICB. The resolution of this patient’s AA with corticosteroids highlights the value of early detection and appropriate treatment of these rare immune-mediated adverse events.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.