A B S T R A C T PurposeTo identify risk factors associated with outcome in children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma in a large cohort of patients
Patients and MethodsPooled data were obtained from 788 patients treated in nine studies performed by European and American cooperative groups. Clinical factors, including age, histology, site of primary, and site(s) and number of sites of metastatic disease, were correlated with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).
ResultsSeven hundred eighty-eight patients were eligible for analysis. The 3-year OS and EFS were 34% (SE, 1.7) and 27% (SE, 1.6), respectively. By univariate analysis, 3-year EFS was significantly and adversely influenced by age, alveolar histology, location of primary tumor in unfavorable site (defined as extremity and "other" sites), presence of three or more sites of metastatic disease, and the presence of bone or bone marrow involvement. By multivariate analysis, EFS was strongly correlated to all factors except histology. Relative risks were 1.6 for age younger than 1 year or at least 10 years, 1.4 for unfavorable site of primary tumor, 1.4 for bone or bone marrow involvement, 1.4 for three or more metastatic sites. EFS was 50% for patients without any of these four adverse factors and was respectively 42%, 18%, 12%, and 5% in patients with one, two, three, or four factors (P Ͻ .0001).
ConclusionThis analysis identified subsets of patients with metastatic rhabdomyosaroma with different outcomes to current therapy and offers a strategy to define patient candidates for experimental approaches to treatment.
Children with group IV RMS treated on the IRS-IV study had improved OS and FFS if they had two or fewer metastatic sites and embryonal histology. This favorable subset of patients has outcomes approaching those observed in selected patients with localized, nonmetastatic disease. Thus, these patients might not be appropriate candidates for regimens that include experimental agents with substantial toxicities or unproven antitumor activity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.