In 1999 the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot was published by a group of independent experts. The consensus process is described in this article together with the Practical Guidelines which were part of the consensus document.

Strategic targets for the management of foot ulcers focus on reducing the incidence of amputation. While data on the incidence of amputation can be obtained relatively easily, the figures require very careful interpretation. Variation in the definition of amputation, population selection and the choice of numerator and denominator make comparisons difficult. Major and minor amputation have to be distinguished as they are undertaken for different reasons and are associated with different costs and functional implications. Many factors influence the decision of whether or not to remove a limb. In addition to disease severity, co-morbidities, and social and individual patient factors, many aspects of the structure of care services affect this decision, including access to primary care, quality of primary care, delays in referral, availability and quality of specialist resources, and prevailing medical opinion. It follows that a high incidence of amputation can reflect a higher disease prevalence, late referral, limited resources, or a particularly interventionist approach by a specialist team. Conversely, a low incidence of amputation can indicate a lower disease prevalence or severity, good management of diabetes in primary and secondary care, or a particularly conservative approach by an expert team. An inappropriately conservative approach could conceivably enhance suffering by condemning a person to months of incapacity before they die with an unhealed ulcer. The reported annual incidence of major amputation in industrialised countries ranges from 0.06 to 3.83 per 10 3 people at risk. Some centres have documented that the incidence is falling, but this is often from a baseline value that was unusually high. Other centres have reported that the incidence has not changed. The ultimate target is to achieve not only a decrease in incidence, but also a low overall incidence. This must be accompanied by improvements in morbidity, mortality, and patient function and mood.

No abstract

SummaryThe outcome of management of diabetic foot ulcers is poor and there is uncertainty concerning optimal approaches to management. We have undertaken a systematic review to identify interventions for which there is evidence of effectiveness. A search was made for reports of the effectiveness of interventions assessed in terms of healing, ulcer area or amputation in controlled clinical studies published prior to December 2006. Methodological quality of selected studies was independently assessed by two reviewers using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria. Selected studies fell into the following categories: sharp debridement and larvae; antiseptics and dressings; chronic wound resection; hyperbaric oxygen (HBO); reduction of tissue oedema; skin grafts; electrical and magnetic stimulation and ultrasound. Heterogeneity of studies prevented pooled analysis of results. Of the 2251 papers identified, 60 were selected for grading following full text review. Some evidence was found to support hydrogels as desloughing agents and to suggest that a systemic (HBO) therapy may be effective. Topical negative pressure (TNP) may promote healing of post-operative wounds, and resection of neuropathic plantar ulcers may be beneficial. More information was needed to confirm the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these and other interventions. No data were found to justify the use of any other topically applied product or dressing, including those with antiseptic properties. Further evidence to substantiate the effect of interventions designed to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers is urgently needed. Until such evidence is available from robust trials, there is limited justification for the use of more expensive treatments and dressings.

OBJECTIVE -Lower-extremity amputation is a common complication among patients with diabetes throughout the world. However, few data exist on the actual impact of the recent moves to improve the management of diabetic foot ulcers to reduce the incidence of lower-extremity amputations. The aim was to determine the incidence of lower-extremity amputations among diabetic patients from 1991 to 2000 in the Netherlands. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-A secondary database containing information regarding all hospital admissions in which a lower-extremity amputation occurred for the years 1991-2000 was obtained from the Dutch National Medical Register. Because a patientunique identifier was included, multiple amputations and hospitalizations for a single individual could be identified. Furthermore, age-and sex-specific diabetes prevalence rates were calculated using a 3-year average for every year, calculating the total diabetic population in the Netherlands at risk for every year.RESULTS -In 1991, a total of 1,687 patients with diabetes had been admitted 1,865 times for 2,409 amputations. In 2000, a total of 1,673 patients with diabetes were admitted 1,932 times for 2,448 amputations. The overall incidence rates of the number of patients who underwent lower-extremity amputation decreased over the years from 55.0 to 36.3 per 10,000 patients with diabetes (P Ͻ 0.05). Both in men (71.8 vs. 46.1, P Ͻ 0.05) and women (45.0 vs. 28.0, P Ͻ 0.05) with diabetes, a significant decrease could be observed. Mean duration of hospitalization decreased from 45.0 days (SD 44.4) in 1991 to 36.2 days (SD 38.4) in 2000; decreases were observed for both men and women.CONCLUSIONS -Over the years observed in this study, the incidence rates of diabetesrelated lower-extremity amputation in the Netherlands was found to decrease in both men (36%) and women (38%) with diabetes. Furthermore, the duration of hospitalization decreased over time.