Background: Primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) is a rare gynecological malignancy though its prevalence may be underestimated given that most 'ovarian' serous cancers originate in the fallopian tube. Its diagnosis is challenging due to its vague signs and symptoms on presentation and it is frequently under-diagnosed pre-operatively. Case Presentation: We present a case of a pre-menopausal woman who presented with vaginal bleeding. Her laboratory testing and physical examination were grossly unremarkable. Gynecologic ultrasound demonstrated multiple uterine fibroids and a double layer endometrium measuring 4.5 mm. More importantly, the left ovary was seen with a complex cyst with mildly echogenic fluid and a solid excerscence. These findings were suspicious for malignancy. The clinical and radiological findings with elevated CA-125 were consistent with a malignant process. Patient subsequently underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy, which required conversion to exploratory laparotomy, supracervical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, right ureteral lysis, right para-aortic and right pelvic lymph node debulking and omentectomy. Biopsy of left fallopian tube and ovary revealed invasive highgrade serous carcinoma of fallopian tube, with involvement of lymphovascular spaces and with surface involvement. Peritoneal washings were negative for malignancy.She was diagnosed with a high-grade serous carcinoma of the fallopian tube after undergoing an endometrial biopsy, multiple imaging tests and finally surgical intervention that yielded the diagnosis. She was started on chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Conclusion:Our aim is to highlight the importance of having PFTC among the differential diagnosis when women present with vaginal bleeding or abdominal pain, as the clinical presentation of PFTC tends to be non-specific, and is often under-diagnosed; reviewing the diagnosis and management, and characterizing the similarities and differences of PFTC with other gynecological malignancies such as ovarian cancer.

e24067 Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) ensures that patients receive care that is in line with their values and preferences. ACP is best done in the outpatient setting. Despite recognizing the importance of ACP, the rates of ACP completion continue to be low. We conducted a retrospective study to determine the rates of ACP in a resident run primary care clinic in Hartford, Connecticut, which serves the underserved community. We looked at patient characteristics to find correlation with ACP completion. We also aimed to determine the reasons which could decrease the completion of ACP. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review. Patients who met any of the inclusion criteria [i) Age>65 ii) End stage renal disease on dialysis iii) Metastatic/Recurrent cancer iv) End stage heart failure v) COPD Gold stage D] and were seen in the primary care clinic from September 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 were selected. Their charts were reviewed to see if ACP was documented during primary care visits over the past two years. The demographics of the patients were noted. Subsequently, a survey was distributed to residents to determine the possible causes of low rates of ACP discussion. Results: The characteristics of the 373 patients included in the study are shown in Table 1. Only 14 (3.8%) of the 373 had documentation of ACP during their primary care visits. The characteristics of the 14 patients in whom ACP was done are as follows: Sex- Female 9/14 (64%); Ethnicity- Hispanic 10/14 (71%), African American 4/14 (29%); Religious Affiliation- Christian 13/14 (93%), None 1/14 (7%); Married/Partner 2/14 (14%). Patient demographics including sex (p 0.6), religious beliefs (p 0.8), and marital status (p 0.6) did not show any correlation with the likelihood of ACP completion. Of the 31 residents who answered the survey, the most commonly listed barriers to ACP completion were the following: lack of time to conduct these discussions (94%), forgetting to conduct ACP discussions (48%), and lack of training (19%). All the residents believed that ACP discussion was beneficial to patients and medical providers. Conclusions: The rates of ACP planning in our clinic are much lower than the national average. African American and Hispanics, who make up the majority of our clinic population, traditionally have had low rates of ACP completion. This is an important issue that needs to be addressed. Advance care planning training should be also be strengthened during residency. [Table: see text]

213 Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most commonly spread sexually transmitted infection and is implicated in the oncogenesis of several cancers, including cervical, anal,vaginal and oropharyngeal cancers. HPV vaccinations have a high efficacy, and recent data demonstrated adults aged 18-26 years old are not adequately fully vaccinated. Our objective was to assess the current practice regarding HPV vaccination among persons 9-45 years of age, knowledge about the HPV guidelines, and recommendation practice. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of Internal Medicine residents acting as primary care physicians at an urban clinic based in Hartford, Connecticut, USA. The survey was administered to internal medicine residents and attending physicians to assess the current practice regarding the HPV vaccination for adults and knowledge of the updated guidelines. The key drivers identified were resident knowledge, communication, insurance coverage, and availability of HPV vaccination in the clinic. An educational handout and lecture was provided with a follow-up survey. Results: A total of 347 charts were reviewed. Of those eligible to receive the HPV vaccine, it was found that only 5.2% received the total dosage. The response rate to our initial survey was 60%. 47.83% did not inquire about the HPV vaccination or recommended it to patients compared to 71.43% of attending physicians (AP) who inquired, but only 28.47% discussed it during precepting sessions. 27.7% of the residents and 71.43% AP correctly identified the updated guidelines. The biggest three barriers were unfamiliarity with the availability of HPV vaccination, insurance coverage, and current guidelines. A short educational review and summary were provided to close the gaps identified with the questionnaire.100% of residents correctly identified the updated guidelines, risks, benefits, importance of shared decision-making, and more likely recommend the HPV vaccination. However, 69.2% were unaware that HPV vaccination does not prevent the progression of HPV-related cancers. Conclusions: Adherence to CDC guidelines regarding vaccinating against HPV amongst resident physicians is poor. The percentage of patients, who received the complete Gardasil-9 vaccination series, was significantly below the national average. Our study highlights a large practice gap that exists amongst resident physicians regarding the HPV vaccine. There was minimal documentation amongst resident physicians regarding shared decision-making conversations with patients. We addressed the knowledge and resource deficit with an educational handout and information session. Our intervention demonstrated improved confidence in discussing the vaccine with the patients and resolved the concern of insurance coverage and availability of vaccines in the clinic and pharmacy.