Breast-conserving therapy (BCT), or breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiation therapy, has become a standard treatment alternative to mastectomy for women with early-stage breast cancer after many long-term studies have reported comparable rates of overall survival and local control. Oncoplastic breast surgery in the setting of BCT consists of various techniques that allow for an excision with a wider margin and a simultaneous enhancement of cosmetic sequelae, making it an ideal breast cancer surgery. Because of the parenchymal rearrangement that is routinely involved in oncoplastic techniques, however, the targeted tissue can be relocated, thus posing a challenge to localize the tumor bed for radiation planning. The goals of this systematic review are to address the challenges, outcomes, and cosmesis of oncoplastic breast surgery in the setting of BCT.

Summary: Nonretroperitoneal abdominal soft tissue sarcoma (NRA-STS) is a rare disease characterized by poor outcomes with limited data supporting its management. Our study indicates that adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with improved survival in high-grade NRA-STS, and higher radiotherapy doses may accentuate this benefit. AbstractBackground: Nonretroperitoneal abdominal soft tissue sarcoma (NRA-STS) is a rare disease with limited data supporting its management. Our study aimed to reveal the utilization patterns of adjuvant therapy and its potential survival benefits using the National Cancer Data Base. Materials:The analysis included patients with resected high-grade NRA-STS. Chi-square analysis was used to evaluate distribution of patient and tumor-related factors within treatment groups.The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model were utilized to evaluate overall survival according to treatment approach. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the impact of these factors on patients' outcome. Matched propensity score analysis was implemented to control for imbalance of confounding variables. Results:At median follow-up of 49 months, 5-year overall survival improved from 46% without adjuvant radiation therapy to 52% (P = 0.009) with radiotherapy delivery with a 30% reduction in hazard of death (95% confidence interval = 0.58-0.84). On multivariate analysis, age <50, tumor <8 cm, negative margins and radiotherapy delivery were significant predictors of improved survival. Chemotherapy was not associated with significant survival improvement (Hazard Ratios[HR]: 0.89, P = 0.28). Conclusion:Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with improved survival in high-grade NRA-STS. Chemotherapy was not associated with a survival improvement; however, further studies are needed to refine treatment strategies.

347 Background: Evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of SBRT in combination with surgery for primary and metastatic liver tumors. Methods: 12 patients completed hepatectomy and SBRT for either hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (3) or metastases from colorectal (4), neuroendocrine (2), uterine (2), or sarcoma (1) primary. All patients with metastases completed chemotherapy. Most patients (7) had resection of their operable metastases, total of 19, and gold fiducials placed in the unresectable lesions, total of 9, to facilitate definitive adjuvant SBRT. One patient with an unresectable metastasis received preoperative SBRT. Two patients with HCC had SBRT as a bridge to liver transplant. Two patients had salvage SBRT for recurrence after surgery. All patients completed 4D-CT for ITV definition and SPECT/CT to define functional normal liver parenchyma volume (NLV). MV-fluoro was performed to confirm tumor/fiducial respiratory motion within the PTV. Results: All patients successfully completed a combination of hepatectomy and SBRT. Seventeen hepatic lesions (≤ 2/patient) were treated with SBRT with a mean PTV 186.0 cc (15.1-803.5). The mean dose was 49.3 Gy (39-60) prescribed to the PTV in 5-6 fractions. With median follow-up of 9.2 months (2.8-15.3) there was no RILD > Grade 1 observed. The most common toxicity was Grade ≤ 2 fatigue. Nine patients had reduced SPECT-NLV vs. calculated NLV by a mean of 487.5 cc (p = 0.0004). In 6 of these, the SPECT-NLV vs. the CT-NLV was reduced by a mean of 253.9 cc (44.6 - 1076.2) reflecting the importance of SPECT functional imaging for SBRT planning. Postoperative morbidity was ≤ Grade 1. All surgical margins were negative. Three patients developed intrahepatic failures post SBRT. However, on follow-up imaging no in-field failures have occurred. Conclusions: The combination of liver SBRT with hepatic resection is safe and effective. It can be used preoperatively to increase resectability or to salvage surgical failures. We also report on the combination of limited hepatectomy for peripheral (including bilobar) hepatic metastases with planned SBRT to unresectable metastatic lesion(s). SBRT planning with SPECT/CT allows identification and preservation of the NLV.