No abstract

Three light intensity-dependent Chl b-deficient mutants, two in wheat and one in barley, were analyzed for their xanthophyll cycle carotenoids and Chl fluorescence characteristics under two different growth PFDs (30 versus 600 μmol photons·m(-2) s(-1) incident light). Mutants grown under low light possessed lower levels of total Chls and carotenoids per unit leaf area compared to wild type plants, but the relative proportions of the two did not vary markedly between strains. In contrast, mutants grown under high light had much lower levels of Chl, leading to markedly greater carotenoid to Chl ratios in the mutants when compared to wild type. Under low light conditions the carotenoids of the xanthophyll cycle comprised approximately 15% of the total carotenoids in all strains; under high light the xanthophyll cycle pool increased to over 30% of the total carotenoids in wild type plants and to over 50% of the total carotenoids in the three mutant strains. Whereas the xanthophyll cycle remained fairly epoxidized in all plants grown under low light, plants grown under high light exhibited a considerable degree of conversion of the xanthophyll cycle into antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin during the diurnal cycle, with almost complete conversion (over 90%) occurring only in the mutants. 50 to 95% of the xanthophyll cycle was retained as antheraxanthin and zeaxanthin overnight in these mutants which also exhibited sustained depressions in PS II photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), which may have resulted from a sustained high level of photoprotective energy dissipation activity. The relatively larger xanthophyll cycle pool in the Chl b-deficient mutant could result in part from the reported concentration of the xanthophyll cycle in the inner antenna complexes, given that the Chl b-deficient mutants are deficient in the peripheral LHC-II complexes.

No abstract

Two very distinctive responses of photosynthesis to winter conditions have been identified. Mesophytic species that continue to exhibit growth during the winter typically exhibit higher maximal rates of photosynthesis during the winter or when grown at lower temperatures compared to individuals examined during the summer or when grown at warmer temperatures. In contrast, sclerophytic evergreen species growing in sun-exposed sites typically exhibit lower maximal rates of photosynthesis in the winter compared to the summer. On the other hand, shaded individuals of those same sclerophytic evergreen species exhibit similar or higher maximal rates of photosynthesis in the winter compared to the summer. Employment of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotective energy dissipation exhibits similar characteristics in the two groups of plants (mesophytes and shade leaves of sclerophytic evergreens) that exhibit upregulation of photosynthesis during the winter. In both, zeaxanthin + antheraxanthin (Z + A) are retained and PS II remains primed for energy dissipation only on nights with subfreezing temperatures, and this becomes rapidly reversed upon exposure to increased temperatures. In contrast, Z + A are retained and PS II remains primed for energy dissipation over prolonged periods during the winter in sun leaves of sclerophytic evergreen species, and requires days of warming to become fully reversed. The rapid disengagement of this energy dissipation process in the mesophytes and shade sclerophytes apparently permits a rapid return to efficient photosynthesis and increased activity on warmer days during the winter. This may be associated with a decreasing opportunity for photosynthesis in source leaves relative to the demand for photosynthesis in the plant's sinks. In contrast, the sun-exposed sclerophytes - with a relatively high source to sink ratio - maintain PS II in a state primed for high levels of energy dissipation activity throughout much of the winter. Independent of whether photosynthesis was up- or downregulated, all species under all conditions exhibited higher levels of soluble carbohydrates during the winter compared to the summer. Thus downregulation of photosynthesis and of Photosystem II do not appear to limit carbohydrate accumulation under winter conditions. A possible signal communicating an altered source/sink balance, or that may be influencing the engagement of Z + A in energy dissipation, is phosphorylation of thylakoid proteins such as D1.