Background The use of veno–arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA‐ECMO) decannulation with different percutaneous closure devices has been increasing. At our center, ProGlide devices have been used since November 2018, and Manta devices became an alternative since March 2020. This study aimed to compare the success and complication rates and the clinical outcomes of ProGlide and Manta devices for VA‐ECMO decannulation after arteriotomy wound closure. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the results of bedside VA‐ECMO decannulation between November 2018 and June 2021. Patients with VA‐ECMO who could be bridged to recovery were recruited and divided into the ProGlide or Manta group based on the closure device used. Procedure time, amount of blood loss, amount of blood products transfused, and use of vasoactive medications during the procedure were documented. Clinical examination and Doppler ultrasound were performed to detect any complications. Results After the closure technique, ProGlide was used in 44 patients and Manta was used in 13. There was no significant difference in the success rate between the ProGlide and Manta groups (86.4% vs. 100%). Amount of blood loss was greater in the ProGlide group than in the Manta group (290 [100–400] ml vs. 50 [50–100] ml), and more patients in the ProGlide group required an increased dose of inotropes during the procedure (59.1% vs. 15.4%), but the transfusion requirement was similar between the two groups. Conclusions The success rate of hemostasis using arteriotomy wound closure during VA‐ECMO decannulation was similar between the two devices.

Percutaneous closure of arteriotomy wound during peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation was shown to be safe and allow earlier mobilization. The new MantaTM vascular closure device (Essential Medical), designed for the closure of arterotomy wound created by large-bore vascular sheaths up to 25Fr during endovascular catheterization procedures, was reported to be applicable in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation. In this article, we would like to share our experience of using real-time ultrasound guidance to ensure the safe application of Manta during bedside venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation.

No abstract

Background: When veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support can be terminated, open repair of arteriotomy wounds in operating theaters is the standard of practice. Comparable outcomes by percutaneous decannulation using different closure devices have been reported. However, transport of the critically- ill, man-power and timeslots of operating theaters could be saved if decannulation was performed at bedside. Method: Bedside percutaneous arteriotomy wound closure became our default method of decannulation since November 2018. We reviewed our 1-year data to evaluate if such practice could be safely adopted in a local high-ECMO-volume center. Results: Between November 2018 and October 2019, 25 patients had their VA-ECMO terminated at the bedside. Twenty-one patients (84%) had successful decannulation. For those who failed, emergency open repair resulted in no additional complications. Two ProGlide devices were used in 15 (71.4%) patients and three were used in 6 (28.6%) patients. The procedure time was 27 (15–45) min. The median blood loss was 300 mL (250–400). Minor complications were found in 4 (19.1%) patients, including two arterial clot formation, one pseudoaneurysm and one wound infection. There were no other major complications. Conclusion: Our 1-year experience showed that percutaneous bedside VA-ECMO decannulation was feasible to commence in a local large-ECMO-volume center.

Distal perfusion catheter (DPC) is commonly employed to prevent lower limb ischemia in patient put on peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Confirming its proper position is important but technically difficult by bedside ultrasound. We describe in this article a novel method to use micro-bubble ultrasound enhancing agents, which are commonly used for contrast echocardiography studies, to confirm DPC position at the bedside. The sequential appearance of the micro-bubbles in the popliteal artery and then popliteal vein by ultrasound after injection through the side port of the DPC confirms the proper DPC position.