Background and Purpose— Guideline adherent oral anticoagulant (OAC) management of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation has been associated with improved outcomes, but limited data are available from Asia. We aimed to investigate outcomes in patients who received guideline compliant management compared with those who were OAC undertreated or overtreated, in a large nationwide multicenter cohort of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in Thailand. Methods— Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were prospectively enrolled from 27 hospitals—all of which are data contributors to the COOL-AF Registry (Cohort of Antithrombotic Use and Optimal INR Level in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Thailand). Patients were categorized as follows: (1) guideline adherence group when OAC was given in high-risk or intermediate-risk, but not in low-risk patients; (2) undertreatment group when OAC was not given in the high-risk or intermediate-risk groups; and (3) overtreatment group when OAC was given in the low-risk group or when OAC was given in combination with antiplatelets without indication. Results— A total of 3327 patients who had follow-up clinical outcome data were included. The mean age of patients was 67.4 years and 58.1% were male. The numbers of patients in the guideline adherence group, undertreatment group, and overtreatment group were 2267 (68.1%), 624 (18.8%), and 436 (13.1%) patients, respectively. The overall rate of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, all bleeding, and death was 3.0%, 4.4%, 15.1%, and 7.8%, respectively. Undertreated patients had a higher risk of ischemic stroke and death compared with guideline adherent patients, and overtreated patients had a higher risk of bleeding and death compared with OAC guideline-managed patients. Conclusions— Adherence to OAC management guidelines is associated with improved clinical outcomes in Asian nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Undertreatment or overtreatment was found to be associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with guideline-adherent management.

Background The objectives of this study were to compare the GARFIELD Refitted model and CHA2DS2‐VASc/HAS‐BLED risk scores with the new model from the COOL‐AF registry for all‐cause death, ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods Patients with non‐valvular AF in the nationwide COOL‐AF registry were studied. Patients were enrolled from 27 hospitals in Thailand during 2014–2017. Main outcomes were all‐cause mortality, SSE and major bleeding. Predictive models of the three outcomes were developed from the variables in the multivariable Cox‐proportional Hazard model. Predictive values of the models were evaluated by C‐statistics, calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA). The new COOL‐AF models were compared with the GARFIELD Refitted models and CHA2DS2‐VASc model for all‐cause mortality, SSE/HAS‐BLED model for major bleeding. Results A total of 3405 patients were enrolled. The C‐statistics for the COOL‐AF models were 0.727 (0.712–0.742), 0.708 (0.693–0.724) and 0.706 (0.690–0.721) for all‐cause mortality, SSE and major bleeding, respectively. Calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted probability the observed outcomes for the COOL‐AF models with a calibration slope of 0.94–0.99. The predictive ability remains preserved after the internal validation with bootstraps and optimism (bias) correction. The COOL‐AF predictive models tended to be superior to the GARFIELD Refitted, CHA2DS2‐VASc and HAS‐BLED models. Conclusion The COOL‐AF predictive models for all‐cause mortality, SSE and major bleeding in Asian patients with AF had a good predictive ability. The COOL‐AF model for all‐cause mortality was superior to the GARFIELD Refitted and CHA2DS2‐VASc model.

Background. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice and outcomes vary substantially in different parts of the world. The contemporary data of PCI in Asia are limited and only available from developed Asian countries. Objectives. To explore the pattern of practice and results of PCI procedures in Thailand as well as a temporal change of PCI practice over time compared with the registry from other countries. Methods. Thai PCI Registry is a prospective nationwide registry that was an initiative of the Cardiac Intervention Association of Thailand (CIAT). All cardiac catheterization laboratories in Thailand were invited to participate during 2018-2019, and consecutive PCI patients were enrolled and followed up for 1 year. Patient baseline characteristics, procedural details, equipment and medication use, outcomes, and complications were recorded. Results. Among the 39 hospitals participated, there were 22,741 patients included in this registry. Their mean age (standard deviation) was 64.2 (11.7) years and about 70% were males. The most common presentation was acute coronary syndrome (57%) with a high proportion of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (28%). Nearly two-thirds of patients had multivessel disease and significant left main stenosis was reported in 11%. The transradial approach was used in 44.2%. The procedural success rate was very high (95.2%) despite the high complexity of the lesions (56.9% type C lesion). The incidence of procedural complications was 5.3% and in-hospital mortality was 2.8%. Conclusion. Thai PCI Registry provides further insights into the current practice and outcomes of PCI in Southeast Asia. The success rate was very high, and the complications were very low despite the high complexity of the treated lesions.

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently the main revascularization modality for these patients. The practice of PCI, outcomes and resource utilization varies in many parts of the world. Therefore, it is important to have local information regarding the patient demographics, pattern of PCI practice, and outcomes. Objective: To report the study design, protocol and rationale of the Thai PCI registry. Materials and Methods: Thai PCI Registry is a prospective, multi-center study which is an initiative project of the Cardiac Intervention Association of Thailand (CIAT). The study consisted of phase I for cross-sectional data registry and phase II for follow up study. The project was started in November 2015. All catheterization laboratories in Thailand were invited to participate in this nationwide registry. The details regarding patient characteristics, procedural details, equipment, and outcomes of PCI were prospectively collected using well-constructed case record form. The protocol of the registry has been approved by the Central Research Ethics Committee (CREC). The project received a research grant from the Health System Research Institute, The Ministry of Public Health, in Thailand, March 2017. Results: There were 39 hospitals from all areas of the country participated in the registration. The hospital type and size were varied and well represented of the PCI centers in Thailand. The registry planned to enroll all consecutive PCI patients at each hospital for approximately one year with the estimated number of PCI at 22,000 procedures. Initially, all patients were followed up for at least 6 and 12 months. Conclusion: The present study provides rationale, protocol, definition and study design of Thai PCI registry. The results of the Thai PCI registry would yield the essential information regarding the current real-world practice as well as the results and complications of PCI. Keywords: Coronary angioplasty; Nationwide registry; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Thailand; Real-world