No abstract

The purpose of this article is to present the specific character of Alternative Food Networks (AFNs) in Poland as one of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). We refer to the issue increasingly debated in the social sciences, that is, how to translate academic models embedded in specific social contexts to other contexts, as we trace the process of adapting ideas and patterns of AFNs developed in the West to the semi-peripheral context of CEE countries. Drawing on the theory of social practices, we divide the analysis into three essential areas: The ideas of the network, its materiality, and the activities within the network. We have done secondary analysis of the research material, including seven case studies the authors worked on in the past decade. We distinguish three network models—imitated, embedded and mixed—which allow us to establish a specific post-transformational AFN growth theory. Particular attention should be paid to the type of embedded networks, as they highlight the possibility of local and original forms of AFNs. Mixed networks show that ideas imported from abroad need to be considered in juxtaposition and connection with local circumstances.

No abstract

This paper will answer the question raised by the ongoing debate on the conditions of Alternative Agro-Food Networks (AAFN) strengthened in the specific context of different European countries. Modern, sustainable local food systems are built on the basis of social networks which linked different actors into a coherent, horizontal web. Producers, processors and consumers are bonded by a common vision and values which go far beyond simple market production. The issue of sustainable food production and consumption gains special importance in the post-transformation countries of Eastern Europe.

Governance of food, energy, and water (FEW) systems is complex and context-dependent. Existing research lacks much empirical research of FEW governance at the local level, especially in cities. This paper compares and contrasts FEW nexus governance in three mid-sized cities: Slupsk, Poland; Tulcea, Romania; and Wilmington, DE, USA. Using document review, semi-structured interviews, and citizen workshops, the comparative analysis examines the extent of collaborative and participatory governance in each case as well as the barriers and opportunities for expanding integrated nexus governance. Limited instances of collaborative and participatory governance emerged reflecting the local contexts and differing roles of non-governmental actors. The cases revealed a lack of awareness of the FEW nexus as well as a lack of opportunity for developing integrated governance or management strategies. Nascent conversations especially on sustainable development provide a starting point for deepening nexus governance in practice.