We compared the surgical outcomes of recent patients with cerebellopontine angle (CPA) epidermoids treated with advanced surgical tools with those of patients treated in earlier series. From November 2000 to June 2004, we treated 12 patients with epidermoid tumors. One patient had a strict CPA lesion. Tumors extended into the prepontine region in seven cases and supratentorially in two. In two cases the CPA was involved bilaterally. All patients but one underwent a lateral suboccipital approach in a semi-sitting position with microsurgical technique. Endoscopic assistance was used in cases with extensions beyond the CPA. In one case, a subtemporal route was used. The mean follow-up was 27 months (range, 8 to 50 months). There were no deaths. Total removal was achieved in 7 of the 10 patients with unilateral CPA epidermoids. Preoperative status improved in eight (80%) patients, particularly the function of cranial nerves (CNs) V and VII. Only two patients had permanent CN deficits. Complete excision with preservation of CN function should be the goals of management of epidermoids of the CPA. In some cases, these goals can be difficult to achieve, even with contemporary surgical equipment. Bilateral and extensive tumors should be removed in staged procedures. The function of CN V and CN VII may recover after decompression, but the outcome of symptoms related to CN VIII is less certain. The endoscope is a reliable tool for assessing the extension of epidermoids, but it cannot be used for tumor removal.
Object
The current, generally accepted optimal management for hydrocephalus related to vestibular schwannomas (VSs) is primary tumor removal, with further treatment reserved only for patients who remain symptomatic. Previous studies have shown, however, that this management can lead to an increase in surgery-related complications. In this study, the authors evaluated their experience with the treatment of such patients, with the aim of identifying the following: 1) the parameters correlating to the need for specific hydrocephalus treatment following VS surgery; and 2) patients at risk for developing hydrocephalus-related complications.
Methods
This was a retrospective study of a 400-patient series. The complication rates and outcomes following primary hydrocephalus treatment versus primary VS removal were compared. Patients undergoing primary tumor removal were further subdivided on the basis of the need for subsequent hydrocephalus treatment. The 3 categories of parameters tested for correlation with the need for such subsequent treatment as well as with heightened risk for developing complications were patient-, tumor-, and hydrocephalus-related.
Results
Of the entire series, 53 patients presented with hydrocephalus. Forty-eight of 53 patients underwent primary VS surgery, of whom 42 (87.5%) did not require additional hydrocephalus treatment. Of the 6 patients who did require additional hydrocephalus treatment, only 3 ultimately required a VP shunt. Factors correlating to the need of hydrocephalus treatment after VS removal were large tumor size, irregular tumor surface, and severe preoperative hydrocephalus. Patients with a longer symptom duration prior to surgery, those with polycyclic tumors, or with inhomogeneous VS, were at heightened risk for the development of CSF leaks. The general and functional outcome of surgery showed no correlation to the presence of preoperative hydrocephalus.
Conclusions
Primary tumor removal is the optimum management of disease in patients with VS with associated hydrocephalus; it leads to resolution of the hydrocephalus in the majority of cases, and the outcome is similar to that of patients without hydrocephalus. Certain factors may aid in identifying patients at risk for developing persistent hydrocephalus as well as those at risk for CSF leaks.
When the right phrenic nerve is used as a donor in neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve, the patient incurs a higher risk of reduced pulmonary VC. If possible, the left phrenic nerve should be preferred. The Pi(max) has to be determined preoperatively to avoid any further decrease in the already reduced pulmonary function due to the initial injury.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.