Despite abundant data on the early evolution of the Central Alps, the latest stage exhumation history, potentially related to relief formation, is still poorly constrained. We aim for a better understanding of the relation between glaciation, erosion and sediment deposition. Addressing both topics, we analysed late Pliocene to recent deposits from the Upper Rhine Graben and two modern river sands by apatite fission-track and (U-Th-Sm)/He thermochronology. From the observed age patterns we extracted the sediment provenance and paleo-erosion history of the Alpine-derived detritus. Due to their pollen and fossil record, the Rhine Graben deposits also provide information on climatic evolution, so that the erosion history can be related to glacial evolution during the Plio-Pleistocene. Our data show that Rhine Graben deposits were derived from Variscan basement, Hegau volcanics, Swiss Molasse Basin, and the Central Alps. The relations between glaciation, Alpine erosion, and thermochronological age signals in sedimentary rocks are more complex than assumed. The first Alpine glaciation during the early Pleistocene did not disturb the long-term exhumational equilibrium of the Alps. Recent findings indicate that main Alpine glaciation occurred at ca. 1 Ma. If true, then main Alpine glaciation was coeval with an apparent decrease of hinterland erosion rates, contrary to the expected trend. We suggest that glaciers effectively sealed the landscape, thus reducing the surface exposed to erosion and shifting the area of main erosion north toward the Molasse basin, causing sediment recycling. At around 0.4 Ma, erosion rates increased again, which seems to be a delayed response to main glaciation. The present-day erosion regime seems to be dominated by mass-wasting processes. Generally, glacial erosion rates did not exceed the pre-glacial long-term erosion rates of the Central Alps.
Southeast Ellesmere Island was the site of two major deformation events that affected the Arctic during the Phanerozoic; the Late Devonian to Early Carboniferous Ellesmerian Orogeny and the Palaeogene Eurekan Orogeny (e.g., Trettin, 1991). Both deformation belts run parallel or sit on top of each other and stretch for >2,500 km across the Canadian High Arctic, North Greenland, and Svalbard (Figure 1a). The deformation fronts of both orogens cross our study area (Figure 1b). Particularly for the Ellesmerian Orogeny, timing and rates are still poorly constrained (e.g., Beauchamp et al., 2019;McClelland et al., 2023;Piepjohn et al., 2007). In Ellesmere Island, this orogeny affected sediments of the Neoproterozoic to early Palaeozoic Franklinian Basin (Figure 1b). After Ellesmerian deformation ceased, the Sverdrup Basin developed within the area of the former Ellesmerian Orogen. The Sverdrup Basin remained an active depocenter until the Eurekan Orogeny (Embry &
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.