No abstract

1. Talsaclidine is an M1-agonist under development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. The aim of the study was to investigate the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of single intravenous and oral doses of [14C]-talsaclidine in mouse, rat, rabbit and monkey. Previous data in humans showed that the drug was mainly excreted into the urine as the unchanged parent drug. The hypothesis was tested if animal data of drugs, which are mainly excreted renally, could be extrapolated to human. 2. The apparent volume of distribution at steady-state (V(ss)) was comparable in all animal species (2-5 l x kg(-1)) indicating an extensive distribution of the drug into tissues. The plasma protein binding was low and comparable in all species including man (< or = 7%). Elimination in terms of clearance was rapid-to-moderate depending on the species. The total plasma clearance (Cl) decreased in the order: mouse (128 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1))> rat (73.9) > monkey (10.6). Urinary excretion is the dominant route of excretion (> or = 86%). 3. A good correlation was achieved with human and animal data in allometric scaling of CI and V(ss). This confirms the hypothesis that renal filtration is scalable over the species and, given a comparable protein binding, animal data is predictive for man.

The functional selectivity of WAL 2014 FU with regard to stimulation of the neuronal muscarinic M1 receptor subtype in vitro and in vivo is shown in different receptor preparations, isolated organ models, whole animal testing, and finally humans. From receptor binding experiments in membrane preparations from rat tissues and from Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing human muscarinic receptor subtypes, it can be delineated that the ratio between M1 and M2 (hm1 and hm2) is shifted in favour of the M1 receptor affinity, when compared to several classic muscarinic agonists such as carbachol, arecoline, and oxotremorine. The intermediate GTP‐shift of 7.5 for WAL 2014 FU in a M2 muscarinic receptor preparation (rat heart) indicates only partial agonistic activity at this subtype, carbachol (e.g., shows a shift of 51). Moreover, the ratio from agonist to antagonist receptor binding comparing the affinities using [3H]cis‐methyldioxolane and [3H]N‐methylscopolamine as radioligands, suggests only a partial agonist behaviour at M2 receptors, too. In functional assays in vitro, such as phosphoinositide breakdown measured in cerebral cortex slices from guinea pig brain, WAL 2014 FU is as effective (27.8% compared to carbachol 100%) as arecoline (27.6%), but is more effective than RS 86 (22.1%), oxotremorine (21.6%) or McN‐A‐343 (14.7%). WAL 2014 FU is about as effective as RS 86 and McN‐A‐343 in stimulating the secretion of N‐acetyl‐glucosaminidase from RBL cells transfected with the human m1 receptor subtype. Investigating the proton efflux from CHO cells expressing hm1, hm2, and hm3 muscarinic receptor with cytosensor technology WAL 2014 FU was clearly more effective at human m1 receptors (66.3% compared to carbachol 100%) than at hm3 receptors (18.6%) and showed no measurable effect at hm2 receptor expressing cells. The efficacy in isolated organ preparations and in whole animals has already been reported [Ensinger et al., 1993] and shows the functional selectivity of WAL 2014 FU quite impressively. The general receptor profile of WAL 2014 FU demonstrates a nearly specific interaction with muscarinic receptors, having only weak binding affinity for a1‐ and nicotinic receptors. Results from pharmacokinetic studies in rats and humans indicate high oral bioavailability (>95% in rats) and very low interindividual variation in plasma levels. Furthermore, good penetration of the blood brain barrier with 2.5‐ to 3‐fold higher concentrations of WAL 2014 FU in brain than in plasma could be measured. The advantageous and stable pharmacokinetic profile of WAL 2014 FU and its functional M1 selectivity establish WAL 2014 FU as a promising candidate for drug treatment of Alzheimer's disease. In addition to its role for symptomatic treatment, WAL 2014 FU may also have a disease‐modifying potential because of its stimulatory effects on APPs secretion. Drug Dev. Res. 40:144–157, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

No abstract