using computerized software on a 1:1 basis, stratified for gender. Nine out of 60 (15%) -five from the intervention arm and four from the control arm -were lost to follow-up. The groups were well-balanced at baseline for demographic and clinical variables.The primary outcome, assessed by independent raters, was psychological distress, measured by GHQ-12 with scores being the total sum across 12 items (possible range 0-36). Other outcomes included: functioning, measured using the 12-item interviewer-administered screener version of the WHODAS 2.0; and post-traumatic stress symptoms, measured using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) 8 , which is a 20-item checklist corresponding to the twenty DSM-5 PTSD symptoms in the last week, with items rated on a 0-4 scale (possible range 0-80).The intervention had high uptake, with 22/30 (73%) completing all sessions. The intervention arm showed improvement in functioning (mean WHODAS 2.0 scores reduced from 17.7 6 9.2 to 6.6 6 6.1 vs. 17.0 6 10.5 to 11.3 6 10.4 in controls) and in posttraumatic stress symptoms (mean PCL-5 scores reduced from 34.2 6 20.1 to 9.8 6 9.1 vs. 32.3 6 17.1 to 19.5 6 18.5 in controls). Due to skewed distribution and variance heterogeneity of the outcome variable, log-linear regression was carried out. After adjustment of baseline scores, the results showed a reduction of 90% in geometric mean within the intervention group (95% CI: 90.4%-91.7%, p50.04) in WHODAS 2.0 scores and a reduction of 92% (95% CI: 91.2%-92.3%, p50.02) in post-traumatic stress symptoms. There was no significant change in GHQ-12 scores. On qualitative evaluation of a sub-sample of participants and primary care staff, we found that the intervention was perceived as useful, and was successfully integrated into primary care centres.As this was a pilot study with a small sample size, recruited through primary care physician referral, and no power calculations were carried out, the findings and their generalizability warrant a cautious interpretation. However, a successful conduction in challenging settings, with adequate enrolment rate, a low drop-out, and balanced randomization provides evidence that RCTs are feasible in such settings. The intervention delivery through non-specialists with no prior mental health care experience and the encouraging results demonstrate the feasibility of the task shifting approach, and are consistent with previous reports 9, 10 . The results of this pilot study should encourage further adaptation and large-scale fully-powered RCTs of this new, transdiagnostic psychological intervention 4 .