No abstract

In a high-income country like Germany, the use of ECMO has been rapidly increasing since 2007 for both respiratory and cardiac support, with a recent plateau in vv-ECMO use. In-hospital mortality decreased with increasing ECMO utilization, but remains high, especially in older patients and in the first 48 h of use.

RationaleThe conventional approach of low-intensity non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) produces only minimal physiological and clinical benefits in patients with stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objectives To determine whether the novel approach of high-intensity NPPV is superior to low-intensity NPPV in controlling nocturnal hypoventilation. Methods A randomised controlled crossover trial comparing 6 weeks of high-intensity NPPV (using controlled ventilation with mean inspiratory pressures of 28.661.9 mbar) with low-intensity NPPV (using assisted ventilation with mean inspiratory pressures of 14.660.8 mbar) was performed in 17 patients with severe stable hypercapnic COPD. Results Two patients refused low-intensity NPPV and two patients dropped out while on low-intensity NPPV. Thirteen patients (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) 0.7660.29 l) completed the trial. High-intensity NPPV produced higher pneumotachographicallymeasured expiratory volumes, with a mean treatment effect of 96 ml (95% CI 23 to 169) (p¼0.015). This resulted in a mean treatment effect on nocturnal arterial carbon dioxide tension (Paco 2 ) of À9.2 mm Hg (95% CI À13.7 to À4.6) (p¼0.001) in favour of high-intensity NPPV. Daily use of NPPV was increased in high-intensity NPPV compared with low-intensity NPPV, with a mean difference of 3.6 h/day (95% CI 0.6 to 6.7) (p¼0.024). In addition, compared with baseline, only high-intensity NPPV resulted in significant improvements in exerciserelated dyspnoea, daytime Paco 2 , FEV 1 , vital capacity and the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency Questionnaire Summary Score. Conclusions High-intensity NPPV is better tolerated by patients with severe chronic hypercapnic COPD and has been shown to be superior to the conventional and widely-used form of low-intensity NPPV in controlling nocturnal hypoventilation. High-intensity NPPV therefore offers a new promising therapeutic option for these patients.