Background Compassion is the first ethical principle of health care to provide high- quality care that influences patient satisfaction and treatment outcome. However, there is limited data on the level of compassionate mental health care practice in low-resource countries like Ethiopia. Objectives This study aimed to assess the level of perceived compassionate care and associated factors among patients with mental illness at Tibebe Ghion specialized and Felege Hiwot comprehensive specialized hospital, North West, Ethiopia, 2022. Methods An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from June 18 to July 16, 2022, at Tibebe Ghion Specialized and Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. A systematic random sampling technique was used. The level of perceived compassionate care was assessed by the validated 12-item Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale among 423 patients with mental illness. Epicollect-5 was used to collect data, which was then exported to the Statistical Product and Service solution version 25 for analysis. Variables with a P-value < 0.05, and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to declare significant variables at the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Result The level of perceived good compassionate care was 47.5% (95% CI 42.6%-52.4%). Factors including urban residence (AOR = 1.90; 95%CI 1.08–3.36), duration of illness < 24 months (AOR = 2.68; 95% CI 1.27–5.65), strong social support (AOR = 4.43; 95%CI 2.16–9.10), shared decision making (AOR = 3.93; 95% CI 2.27–6.81), low perceived stigma(AOR = 2.97; 95% CI 1.54–5.72) and low patient anticipated stigma (AOR = 2.92; 95% CI 1.56–5.48) were positively associated with good compassionate care. Conclusion and recommendation Less than half of the patients had received good compassionate care. Compassionate mental health care needs public health attention. Policymakers should emphasize on compassionate care continuity by including it in the health care curriculum and design appropriate policies to strengthen compassionate care.
Background Shared decision-making is a patient–centered and a recovery-oriented mental health system in which consumers are encouraged to actively engage in illness management. Although shared decision-making research in mental health has evolved rapidly in the past two decades, there is a lack of studies examining the level and factors associated with shared decision-making practice in low-income countries like Ethiopia. Methods An institutional-based explanatory sequential mixed method study design was conducted from July 18 to September 18, 2022, at Bahir Dar city specialized hospitals. A systematic random sampling technique was used. The level of shared-decision making was measured by 9-item shared decision-making questionnaire among 423 patients with mental illness. Epicollect5 was used to collect data, which was then exported to the Statistical Package for social science version 25 for analysis. Variables with a P-value < 0.25 were considered candidates for the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used to show the strength of the association. An in-depth interview was conducted among ten purposively selected participants. Result Low shared decision-making practice was found to be 49.2% (95% CI 45.9%-55.7%). The Multivariate analysis showed that low perceived compassionate care (AOR = 4.45; 95%CI 2.52–7.89), low social support (AOR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.06–2.80), and no community-based health insurance (AOR = 1.96; 95%CI l.04–3.69) were positively associated with low shared decision making. The qualitative result showed that the most common barriers to shared decision-making were a lack of empathy and a shortage of mental health workers. Conclusion and recommendation Almost half of the patients had low shared decision-making practices. This implies that shared decision-making requires high attention as it is essential for patient-centered care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.