Objective: To improve the safety of the anterior cervical vertebral surgical approach, MRI and CT have been used and the distances between the medial borders of the longus colli (LC) to expose the uncinated process (UP) have been reported. The anatomic parameters of the LC and vertebral artery (VA) were considered here in relation to the UP to minimize complications.Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from 60 Thai adult skeletons and 20 embalmed cadavers. Direct measurements of the dry cervical vertebrae were performed using digital Vernier calipers, while computer imaging analysis was used for the cadaveric measurements after capturing the images.Results: No significant difference was noted in the inter-UP distance between the dry and cadaveric cervical measurements. The average UP width was 6.7 ± 0.2 mm. The average distance from the tip of the UP to the VA was 2.6 ± 0.1 mm. The calculated distance from the LC to the UP which derived from the inter-UP distance and the distance between the LC increased from C2 to C7 with an average distance of 11.9 ± 0.3 mm.Conclusion: Within a distance of 11.9 ± 0.3 mm from the medial border of the LC, UP can be identified. Dissecting at a distance less than 10 mm posterior, 5–6 mm lateral and superior to the base of the UP can avoid VA injury and optimize the safety of the anterior cervical vertebral surgical approach.
The deep peroneal nerve (DPN) is considered one of the clinically significant nerves of the lower extremity since several clinical abnormalities can commonly be caused by its defects, either in its sensory or motor functions. Its derivatives, classified as muscular, cutaneous, and articular, mainly supply the muscles in the anterior fascial compartment of the leg and the dorsum of the foot, the 1st dorsal web space of the foot, the ankle joint, and certain joints of the foot. To improve the effectiveness of clinical practices involving the DPN, it is important to first understand its anatomical nature, including its typical characteristics and the variants (orientation, branching, and analogous structure), prior to applying such practices in clinical implementation. This review, therefore, aims to review the previously studied information of DPN on its fundamental anatomy and link it to the provided examples of current commonly used procedures, both non-invasive and invasive, e.g., nerve imaging, nerve block, neuroelectrophysiological study, and free autologous tissue transfer, thereby giving an integrated view in the translational medicine of DPN. Conclusively, the ultimate goal of this review is to help maximize the therapeutic effectiveness and to minimize the unanticipated complications of any clinical practices involving the DPN by inferring from its anatomical knowledge.
The person with cerebral palsy has a range of functional limitations which can restrict activities of daily living. Sitting for extended periods is a pertinent issue to address. Custom seating orthosis combined with a wheelchair could reduce issues associated with long-term sitting in this population. The custom seating system for a child with cerebral palsy GMFCS Level IV was provided and outcome measures which measured functional grasping and seat pressure distribution was evaluated while the patient was seated in a traditional wheelchair as well as the custom seating wheelchair.Time to complete tasks while seated in the custom seating wheelchair was longer in duration than when seated in the traditional wheelchair, however, pressure was reduced in pressure prone areas and distributed more across pressure tolerant areas. The custom seating system provided to this patient evidences the utility and usefulness of a customized orthotic intervention for the wheelchair intervention. Additional accommodation to the custom seating could posit differences in outcomes as would an increase in study participants.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.