No abstract

No abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the impact of proximity to broad bond rating change on annual report reading difficulty.Design/methodology/approachWe use regression analysis to examine the association between proximity to broad bond rating change and reading difficulty of annual report.FindingsUsing a large panel sample with 11,767 firm-year observations representing 1,474 unique US companies from 1994 to 2016, we find a significant positive relation between proximity to broad bond rating change and annual report reading difficulty, which suggests that the annual reports of borderline firms are difficult for stakeholders to read and understand.Originality/valueBy investigating whether and how borderline firms manipulate readability of annual reports, our study contributes to bond rating research in finance literature and disclosure quality research in accounting literature. To the best of our knowledge, this study is perhaps the first empirical study that directly tests the link between proximity to broad bond rating change and annual report readability. In particular, the majority of prior studies concentrate on the economic consequences of annual report readability, but few studies investigate the determinants of readability. Therefore, examining the impact of proximity to broad bond rating change on readability contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of annual report readability.

For many companies, investment in information systems (IS) is one of the largest expenditures in the firm's capital budget. An important goal of ex ante investment evaluation of an information system is to reasonably determine the return on investment (ROI) of the proposed information system. However, past research has shown that business managers have significant concerns about the soundness of ex ante ROI evaluations of information systems. This relates to the fact that several benefits of an IS are intangible and nonfinancial. In addition, it has long been recognized that, unlike many other capital projects, IS projects exhibit significant contextual interaction. Further, different professionals such as accountants and Information Technology (IT) personnel often use different approaches to evaluate a potential information system. This study develops a framework and methodology that integrates and accommodates the different perspectives of IT personnel, accountants, and business managers. We propose a flexible ex ante framework and methodology that integrates systems analysis, accounting, and strategy (SAAS). The framework evaluates financial and nonfinancial factors and uses analyses that consider investment approaches used by both IT and accounting personnel. The framework is evaluated in two different organizations and recommendations are made for both future research in this area and for the applied use of the framework by professionals.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the relation between managerial ability and fair value inputs (measured as fair value intensity) for nonfinancial firms. Design/methodology/approach This study uses regression analysis to investigate the impact of managerial ability on the level of fair value inputs. Findings This study finds significant and positive relations between managerial ability and use of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value inputs. On the other hand, this study finds an insignificant relation between managerial ability and Level 3 inputs. Originality/value The findings contribute to two research streams. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is perhaps the first study that directly examines the link between managerial ability and fair value inputs.