Purpose The aims were to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to compare the efficacy of fat-suppressed proton-density turbo-spin-echo (FS-PD-TSE) images and T1-weighted (T1WIs) and T2-weighted images (T2WIs) in identifying cartilaginous endplate failure (CEF), and to propose a modified Rajasekaran classification based on the FS-PD-TSE sequence. Methods Thirty-one lumbar disc herniation (LDH) cases were enrolled. Totally, 155 discs and 310 endplates were evaluated by MRI with T1W, T2W, and FS-PD-TSE sequences. Disc degeneration (DD), LDH grades, and the total endplate score (TEPS) of CEF were evaluated. Chi-square, Spearman rank correlation analysis, and multiclass logistic regression were used to compared the sensitivity in diagnosing CEF. A modified Rajasekaran classification based on FS-PD-TSE sequence was established to diagnose CEF. The multiclass logistic regression model was used to analyse the relationship between modified Rajasekaran classification and DD and LDH. Results There were 117 (75.5%) segments with CEF in T1WIs, 115 (74.2%) in T2WIs, and 127 (81.9%) in FS-PD-TSE, respectively. Chi-square test showed FS-PD-TSE images were more sensitive than T1WIs and T2WIs (P < 0.05). Spearman rank correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between TEPS and LDH and DD in T1WIs, T2WIs, and FS-PD-TSE images (P < 0.05). A multiclass logistic regression model showed that the incidence of DD and LDH significantly increased accordingly with increases in modified Rajasekaran classification (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe FS-PD-TSE sequence has high diagnostic value for lumbar CEF. CEF is a risk factor for LDH. The new classification for lumbar CEF based on the FS-PD-TSE sequence has good predictive ability for LDH and DD.
Background In the present study, we reported the clinical use of uniplanar cannulated pedicle screws for the correction of Lenke type 1 adolescent Idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and its safety and clinical outcomes were also evaluated. Methods 68 patients with Lenke type 1 AIS were included, among which 38 patients were treated with uniplanar cannulated screws at the concave side of periapical levels and multiaxial screws at the other levels (group A). Moreover, the remaining 30 patients were treated with all multiaxial screws (group B). The preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters of the Lenke type 1 AIS, axial vertebral rotation, and the safety of the pedicle screws were evaluated by X-rays and computed tomography (CT). Results Preoperative data was comparable between two groups. The postoperative proximal thoracic (PT) curve, main thoracic (MT) curve, thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve, and apical vertebral rotation were significantly improved compared with the preoperative data. The coronal correction rates in group A and B were 83% and 81.9%, respectively (P > 0.05). The derotation rates in group A and B were 60.8% and 43.2%, respectively (P < 0.05). The rotation classification in the group A was also better compared with the group B. The misplacement rate in group A and B was 7.9% and 11.8%, respectively (P < 0.05), and the total misplacement rate on the concave side (11.4%) was higher than that of convex side (8.4%). The lateral perforation was found at the concave side, while the medial perforation was found at the convex side. On the concave side, the misplacement rate in group A and B was 9.7% and 12.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). The grades 2 and 3 perforations were three (3.5%) in the group A and eight (8.2%) in the group B (P < 0.05). On the convex side, the misplacement rate in group A and B was 5.9% and 11.1%, respectively (P < 0.05). The grades 2 and 3 perforations were one (0.9%) in the group A and four (4.4%) in the group B (P < 0.05). Conclusion Collectively, uniplanar cannulated pedicle screws could effectively increase the accuracy of pedicle screws and facilitate the derotation of the apical vertebra compared with the multiaxial pedicle screws. Trial registration retrospectively registered
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.