Cervical cancer is a malignant epithelial tumor that forms in the uterine cervix. Most cases of cervical cancer are preventable through human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination, routine screening, and treatment of precancerous lesions. However, due to inadequate screening protocols in many regions of the world, cervical cancer remains the fourth-most common cancer in women globally. The complete NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of cervical cancer. This manuscript discusses guiding principles for the workup, staging, and treatment of early stage and locally advanced cervical cancer, as well as evidence for these recommendations. For recommendations regarding treatment of recurrent or metastatic disease, please see the full guidelines on NCCN.org.

Endometrial carcinoma is a malignant epithelial tumor that forms in the inner lining, or endometrium, of the uterus. Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy. Approximately two-thirds of endometrial carcinoma cases are diagnosed with disease confined to the uterus. The complete NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of endometrial cancer and uterine sarcoma. This manuscript discusses guiding principles for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of early-stage endometrial carcinoma as well as evidence for these recommendations.

Background On August 14, 2014, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved the anti-angiogenesis drug, bevacizumab, for women with advanced cervical cancer based on a 2012 interim analysis of 271 deaths on GOG protocol 240. We now report the planned protocol-specified final analysis of the primary objective, overall survival (OS). Methods A phase III randomized trial using a 2×2 factorial design was conducted to determine whether intravenous chemotherapy [(cisplatin 50 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 135 or 175 mg/m2) or (topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 days 1–3 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2)] with or without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) improves OS in recurrent/persistent/metastatic cervical cancer. Patients were prospectively stratified by performance status, prior radiosensitizing platinum, and disease status. We estimated enrolling 450 patients with 346 deaths at final analysis to provide 90% power to detect a 30% reduction in risk of death. Findings On March 7, 2014, 348 deaths occurred among 452 patients. Regimens administering bevacizumab continued to demonstrate significant improvement in OS: 16.8 vs 13.3 mos (HR 0.77;95% CI 0.62–0.95;p=0.0068). Updated progression-free survival also favored bevacizumab (HR 0.68;95% CI 0.56–0.84;p=0.0002). Final OS among 20% (n=91) not treated with prior pelvic radiotherapy was 24.5 (bevacizumab) vs 16.8 mos (without bevacizumab). Fistula (any grade) occurred in 14.5% (n=32) receiving bevacizumab (all previously irradiated). Grade 3+ fistula developed in 5.9% (n=13) and did not result in surgical emergency, sepsis and/or death. Post-progression OS was not significantly different among those who did and did not receive bevacizumab (median 8.4 vs 7.1 mos: HR 0.32;95% CI 0.66–1.05;p=0.06). Interpretation The benefit conferred by incorporation of bevacizumab is sustained with extended follow-up as evidenced by the survival curves remaining separated. Following progression on bevacizumab, a negative rebound effect was not observed. This represents proof-of-concept of the efficacy and tolerability of anti-angiogenesis therapy in advanced cervical cancer. Funding National Cancer Institute (USA).

No abstract

The NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide interdisciplinary recommendations for treating cervical cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the NCCN Cervical Cancer Panel's discussion and major guideline updates from 2014 and 2015. The recommended systemic therapy options for recurrent and metastatic cervical cancer were amended upon panel review of new survival data and the FDA's approval of bevacizumab for treating late-stage cervical cancer. This article outlines relevant data and provides insight into panel decisions regarding various combination regimens. Additionally, a new section was added to provide additional guidance on key principles of evaluation and surgical staging in cervical cancer. This article highlights 2 areas of active investigation and debate from this new section: sentinel lymph node mapping and fertility-sparing treatment approaches.