Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered a curative treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Growing data have demonstrated that cryoablation represents a safe and effective alternative therapy for HCC, but no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been reported to compare cryoablation with RFA in HCC treatment. The present study was a multicenter RCT aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation with RFA for the treatment of HCC. In all, 360 patients with Child-Pugh class A or B cirrhosis and one or two HCC lesions £ 4 cm, treatment-na€ ıve, without metastasis were randomly assigned to cryoablation (n 5 180) or RFA (n 5 180). The primary endpoints were local tumor progression at 3 years after treatment and safety. Local tumor progression rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 3%, 7%, and 7% for cryoablation and 9%, 11%, and 11% for RFA, respectively (P 5 0.043). For lesions >3 cm in diameter, the local tumor progression rate was significantly lower in the cryoablation group versus the RFA group (7.7% versus 18.2%, P 5 0.041). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 97%, 67%, and 40% for cryoablation and 97%, 66%, and 38% for RFA, respectively (P 5 0.747). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year tumor-free survival rates were 89%, 54%, and 35% in the cryoablation group and 84%, 50%, and 34% in the RFA group, respectively (P 5 0.628). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that Child-Pugh class B and distant intrahepatic recurrence were significant negative predictors for overall survival. Major complications occurred in seven patients (3.9%) following cryoablation and in six patients (3.3%) following RFA (P 5 0.776). Conclusion: Cryoablation resulted in a significantly lower local tumor progression than RFA, although both cryoablation and RFA were equally safe and effective, with similar 5-year survival rates. (HEPATOLOGY 2015;61:1579-1590 See Editorial on Page 1465 H epatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth ranking cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally.1 The incidence of HCC in China accounts for 55% of all HCC cases worldwide.2 Although hepatic resection remains a first-line treatment for HCC and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) offers high rates of disease-free remission, only 10-15% of HCC patients are suitable for hepatic resection or OLT. Therefore, percutaneous local ablative techniques including percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave (MV), and cryoablation (CRYO) have been the alternative options to unresectable HCC in cirrhosis patients.

Although surgical resection with curative intent is the main therapy for both primary and metastatic lung tumors, about 80% of lung cancers cannot be removed by surgery. Because most patients with unresectable lung cancer only receive limited benefits from traditional radiotherapy and chemotherapy, many novel local treatment modalities have emerged including local ablation therapy. The Minimally Invasive Treatment of Lung Cancer Branch, Professional Committee of Minimally Invasive Treatment of Cancer of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association and Committee on Tumor Ablations, Chinese College of Interventionalists have organized multidisciplinary experts to develop guidelines for this treatment modality. These guidelines aim at standardizing thermal ablation procedures, describing the indications for candidates, assessing outcomes, and preventing postablation complications.

Currently, with the rapid development of nanotechnology, novel drug delivery systems have made rapid progress, in which nanocarriers play an important role in the tumor treatment. In view of the conventional chemotherapeutic drugs with many restrictions such as non-specific systemic toxicity, short half-life and low concentration in the tumor sites, stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems can deliver anti-tumor drugs targeting to the specific sites of tumors. Owing to precise stimuli response, stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems can control drug release, so as to improve the curative effects, reduce the damage of normal tissues and organs, and decrease the side effects of traditional anti-cancer drugs. At present, according to the physicochemical properties and structures of nanomaterials, they can be divided into three categories: 1) endogenous stimuli-responsive materials, including pH, enzyme and redox responsive materials; 2) exogenous stimuli-responsive materials, such as temperature, light, ultrasound and magnetic field responsive materials; 3) multi-stimuli responsive materials. This review mainly focuses on the researches and developments of these novel stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems based on above-mentioned nanomaterials and their clinical applications.

Sarcomas are rare but malignant tumors with high risks of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Anti-angiogenic therapy is a potential strategy against un-controlled and not-organized tumor angiogenesis. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of apatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, in patients with advanced sarcoma. Thirty-one patients who received initial apatinib between September 2015 and August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 19 (61.3%) patients were heavily pretreated with two or more lines of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Apatinib was given at a start-dose of 425 mg qd. During therapy, 9 (29.0%) patients required dose interruption and 7 (22.6%) needed dose reduction, and the mean dosage of apatinib was 372.9 ± 68.4 mg/day. In the study cohort, one patient was treated as adjunctive therapy and 6 patients stopped treatment before radiographic response assessment. Thus, 24 patients were eligible for tumor response evaluation. The objective response rate was 33.3% and clinical benefit rate was as high as 75.0%. The progression free survival was 4.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22-5.11) months, whereas the overall survival was 9.43 (95% CI, 6.64-18.72) months. Compared with other histological subtypes, leiomyosarcoma did not show significant survival benefits. Most of the adverse events (AEs) were at grade 1 or 2. The main grade 3 AEs were hypertension (6.5%), hand foot skin reaction (6.5%), and diarrhea (3.2%). In conclusion, apatinib showed promising efficacy and acceptable safety profile in metastatic or recurrent sarcoma, giving rationale clinical evidence to conduct clinical trials.

To assess the efficacy of combining radioimmunoconjugate [(131)I] metuximab with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment compared with RFA alone, a single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted on 127 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system (BCLC) classifications of 0-B stage. Patients received either RFA followed by [(131)I] metuximab (n = 62) or RFA alone (n = 65). The primary outcome was overall tumor recurrence. Statistical tests were two-sided. The one- and two-year recurrence rates in the combination group were 31.8% and 58.5%, whereas those in the RFA group were 56.3% and 70.9%, respectively. The median time to overall tumor recurrence was 17 months in the combination group and 10 months in the RFA group (P = .03). The RFA-[(131)I] metuximab treatment showed a greater antirecurrence benefit than RFA in the metuximab target (ie, CD147)-positive subpopulation (P = .007). [(131)I] metuximab may yield prevention of tumor recurrence after RFA.