The aim of our study was to analyse the serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) levels in patients with AS and their relationship with disease activity. An ELISA test was used to analyse serum cytokine (IL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta and IFN-gamma) levels in 69 patients with AS. Results were compared with those from 43 patients with RA and 36 patients with non-inflammatory back pain. The relationship between serum concentrations of the different cytokines and parameters of disease activity and severity in AS patients was also evaluated. IL-6 and TNF-alpha serum levels, but not IL-1 beta and IFN-gamma, were significantly higher in AS than in NIBP. However, patients with RA showed higher serum levels of IL-6, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma than both AS and NIBP patients. In AS, IL-6 correlated with clinical parameters of disease activity with significant correlation being observed with laboratory parameters of inflammation such as ESR, CRP, platelet count and clinical parameters of severity such as vertebral mobility. TNF-alpha did not correlate with laboratory or clinical parameters of activity. Macrophagic cytokines (TNF-alpha and IL-6), are increased in AS patients and IL-6 closely correlated with the activity of the disease.
Summary. The objectives of the present study were to compare the interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) serum levels of individuals with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) with those of healthy controls, and to ascertain the predictor value of these cytokines in the evolution from MGUS to multiple myeloma. After a median follow-up of 7 years from the initial cytokine measurements, nine patients with MGUS have evolved to a malignant condition. The actuarial probability of malignant transformation in patients with increased IL-6 and TNF-alpha was not significantly higher than in those with normal values.
Several studies have been carried out to clarify the relationship between CD30 expression and Th2 lymphocytes, although the results have been controversial. To investigate whether CD30 is a useful marker for Th2 lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in interstitial lung diseases (ILD), we studied six control subjects and 31 patients with ILD (12 with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, seven with hypersensitivity pneumonitis, three with chronic eosinophilic pneumonia and nine with sarcoidosis). The levels of interleukin-5 (IL-5) (secreted by Th2 cells), interferon-gamma (IFNgamma) (secreted by Th1 cells) and the expression of CD30 on lymphocytes were determined in BAL fluid. There were no differences in the percentage of CD30+ lymphocytes between controls and patients with ILD (0.8+0.4% vs. 2+/-0.4%). In order to determine the relationship between Th2 cells and CD30 expression, we divided the patients into two groups according to BAL IL-5 levels. Group I consisted of eight patients (three chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, three hypersensitivity pneumonitis, two idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) with high IL-5 levels (298+/-138 pg ml(-1)). Group II consisted of the remaining 23 ILD patients with normal IL-5 levels (0.9+/-0.6 pg ml(-1)). The percentage of eosinophils in BAL fluid was significantly higher in group I compared with group 11 (34+/-16% vs. 3+/-1%, P < 0.05). A correlation between CD30+ lymphocytes and IL-5 in group 1 was not shown. There were no differences in the number of CD30+ I we found a significant correlation between IL-5 levels and the percentage of eosinophils (r = 0.95, P < 0.0001). Our results suggest that CD30 does not appear to be a useful marker for Th2 lymphocytes in BAL from patients with ILD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.