Background Recent evidence suggests that ultrasound measurements of carotid and brachial artery corrected flow time (FTc) and respirophasic variation in blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak) are valuable for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanical ventilated patients. We performed the study to reveal the performance of ultrasonic measurements of radial artery FTc and ΔVpeak for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanical ventilated patients undergoing gynecological surgery. Methods A total of eighty mechanical ventilated patients were enrolled. Radial artery FTc and ΔVpeak, and non-invasive pulse pressure variation (PPV) were measured before and after fluid challenge. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in stroke volume index (SVI) of 15% or more after the fluid challenge. Multivariate logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to screen multivariate predictors of fluid responsiveness and identify the predictive abilitie of non-invasive PPV, ΔVpeak and FTc on fluid responsiveness. Results Forty-four (55%) patients were fluid responders. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that radial artery FTc, ΔVpeak, and non-invasive PPV were the independent predictors of fluid responsiveness, with odds ratios of 1.152 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.045 to 1.270], 0.581 (95% CI 0.403 to 0.839), and 0.361 (95% CI, 0.193 to 0.676), respectively. The area under the ROC curve of fluid responsiveness predicted by FTC was 0.802 (95% CI, 0.706–0.898), and ΔVpeak was 0.812 (95% CI, 0.091–0.286), which were comparable with non-invasive PPV (0.846, 95%CI, 0.070–0.238). The optimal cut-off values of FTc for fluid responsiveness was 336.6 ms (sensitivity of 75.3%; specificity of 75.9%), ΔVpeak was 14.2% (sensitivity of 88.2%; specificity of 67.9%). The grey zone for FTc was 313.5–336.6 ms and included 40 (50%) of the patients, ΔVpeak was 12.2–16.5% and included 37(46%) of the patients. Conclusions Ultrasound measurement of radial artery FTc and ΔVpeak are the feasible and reliable methods for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Trial registration The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR)(www.chictr.org), registration number ChiCTR2000040941.
Background: Pregnancy luoteomas are tumor-like ovarian lesions that emerge during pregnancy and spontaneously regress after delivery. Antenatal diagnosis is infrequently reported, and unnecessary surgery appears to be common in literature reports. Case summary: A 28-year-old primigravida with bilateral adnexal masses was discovered at 32 + 5 weeks during prenatal ultrasound evaluation. Combined with clinical presentation, auxiliary examinations including blood test, magnetic resonance imaging, gastroscopy, and consultation of multi-disciplinary team, we successfully made a diagnosis of pregnancy luteoma and provided conservative management recommendations. A cesarean section was conducted on this patient at 34 + 2 weeks of gestation due to fetal distress. The newborn was small for gestational age but normal in appearance. We performed biopsies of the adnexal masses, which were confirmed to be pregnancy luteomas using both intraoperative frozen section and final pathological diagnosis. Serum testosterone, cancer antigen 125, and alpha-fetoprotein levels gradually declined and normalized on postoperative day 28. The masses significantly decreased in size as shown by ultrasonic and magnetic resonance imaging examination on postoperative day 7, with the ovaries returning to their normal size by postoperative day 30. Conclusion: Prenatal diagnosis of pregnancy luteoma poses a challenge, requiring hormonal examinations, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and gastrointestinal endoscopy for identification. Caution must be exercised to avoid overtreatment. While additional cases are needed to summarize the imaging features and effects of excess hormones on the both mother and fetus, further research is necessary for a comprehensive understanding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.